2016
DOI: 10.1080/14664208.2016.1204053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

English-medium instruction in Japanese universities: policy implementation and constraints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, in a Korean EMI setting, content teachers express difficulties in keeping to an English-only policy due to students' low proficiency, and the teachers are often required to assist the students with their English improvement as well as mastery of content (Choi, 2013). In a Japanese EMI setting students, despite having studied English for 6 years before admission, often lack a sufficient level of L2 proficiency to thrive in an EMI environment (Patrick Ng, 2017). Though the impact of L2 proficiency on content learning has not been well documented (Macaro et al, 2018), researchers highlight a potential failure to guarantee the quality of content instruction (Floris, 2014;Tatzl, 2011).…”
Section: Proficiency Issues In Emimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, in a Korean EMI setting, content teachers express difficulties in keeping to an English-only policy due to students' low proficiency, and the teachers are often required to assist the students with their English improvement as well as mastery of content (Choi, 2013). In a Japanese EMI setting students, despite having studied English for 6 years before admission, often lack a sufficient level of L2 proficiency to thrive in an EMI environment (Patrick Ng, 2017). Though the impact of L2 proficiency on content learning has not been well documented (Macaro et al, 2018), researchers highlight a potential failure to guarantee the quality of content instruction (Floris, 2014;Tatzl, 2011).…”
Section: Proficiency Issues In Emimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous findings on the supportive value of institutional resources across multilingual university contexts are mixed and depend on specific resources and conditions of implementation. In multiple contexts, successful implementation of EMI depends on the presence of international students, local and foreign EMI faculty, textbooks and learning materials, preparatory courses for students, and faculty professional development (Corrales et al, 2016;Goodman, 2014;Lino, 2020;NG Chin Leong, 2017). However, as Ghazarian and Youhne (2015) argue, international faculty who are unprepared to adjust their teaching styles in cross-cultural educational environments may gradually assimilate into local education or reject their students' expectations.…”
Section: Structural Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many universities offer training and on-going in-house support (see, for example, Dafouz, 2018) and in certain contexts, faculty are required to undertake a certification course before teaching EMI courses (Dubow & Gundermann, 2017;Macaro et al, 2020). Despite this, however, teaching faculty who are required to teach EMI courses may not have received any formal training in how to teach their subject through the medium of English (see Guarda & Helm, 2017;Leong, 2017;O'Dowd, 2018). Where the capacity does not exist to provide such training locally, external EMI training and support may be required.…”
Section: Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%