2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2021.04.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Engrafted Donor-Derived Clonal Hematopoiesis after Allogenic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation is Associated with Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease Requiring Immunosuppressive Therapy, but no Adverse Impact on Overall Survival or Relapse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given that Gibson et al found a positive correlation between DNMT3A variants on relapse-free survival after HSCT in general [ 8 ], this may explain why the indicated case of DCL arose after a long latency of almost 10 years. Consistent with previous publications, we do not believe that the concomitant DNMT3A variant had a causal (negative) impact on DCL pathogenesis [ 8 , 10 ].…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
“…Given that Gibson et al found a positive correlation between DNMT3A variants on relapse-free survival after HSCT in general [ 8 ], this may explain why the indicated case of DCL arose after a long latency of almost 10 years. Consistent with previous publications, we do not believe that the concomitant DNMT3A variant had a causal (negative) impact on DCL pathogenesis [ 8 , 10 ].…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
“…11 Exploratory studies have found that CH in transplant donors can engraft in recipients [12][13][14][15] but have reported conflicting results on the impact of donor CH on transplant-specific clinical outcomes, graft immunologic function, and risk of donor cell leukemia (DCL). 12,13,16,17 These studies have been limited by modest sample sizes that affected outcomes analysis, cohort characteristics that restricted generalizability, and a lack of mechanistic rationale. Furthermore, these cohorts have not parsed the clinical impact of different CH mutations or used sequencing technologies that support evaluation of low-abundance clones, which could have unique dynamics in the context of allogeneic transplantation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 8 reported no difference in cGvHD incidence between the two groups, similar to our result, with no impact of donor CHIP on relapse risk. In another study by Newell et al ., 32 donor-derived CHIP was not associated with relapse or OS; however, patients with donor-derived CHIP were more likely to develop cGvHD, necessitating systemic immunosuppressive therapy (IST) ( P =0.045) and less likely to discontinue IST ( P =0.03) compared with controls without donor-derived CHIP. Thus, the differential impact of donor CHIP on relapse risk may not be directly from a putative biological CHIP-related protection from relapse but may instead be related to the occurrence of GvHD, which can indirectly affect the risk of relapse.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%