2002
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1703645
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Engraftment syndrome in children undergoing autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation

Abstract: Summary:There is limited experience on engraftment syndrome (ES) in children. The present study analyzes the characteristics of ES in pediatric patients undergoing autologous peripheral blood progenitor cells transplantation (PBPCT). From 1993 to 2001, 30 of 156 patients (19.2%) who underwent PBPCT developed ES (skin rash which involved more than 27% of the body surface and temperature Ͼ38.3؇C with no compatible infectious disease etiology, during neutrophil recovery). Of the 30 patients who developed ES, 20 (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
27
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…1 We now present here the largest prospective study of ES after autologous PBPCT in pediatric patients. In 1995, Lee et al 5 described ES as the presence of skin rash and noninfectious neutropenic fever in the periengraftment period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1 We now present here the largest prospective study of ES after autologous PBPCT in pediatric patients. In 1995, Lee et al 5 described ES as the presence of skin rash and noninfectious neutropenic fever in the periengraftment period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 However, the reported incidence has varied widely in part due to the lack of uniform diagnostic criteria. [2][3][4] This has also influenced the analysis of risk factors for ES.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are also conflicting data regarding an association between ES, NRM and survival. 1,2,[10][11][12][13][14][15] Some of these discordances likely reflect different definitions of ES.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…94 Furthermore, mobilization with high-dose G-CSF (12 mg/kg s.c. twice daily, beginning 4 days before apheresis and continuing until the end of apheresis) has been reported to increase the risk for development of engraftment syndrome in children who are undergoing mobilization for auto-HSCT to treat hematological malignancies or solid tumors. 95 GM-CSF plus G-CSF Significant synergism has been reported between GM-CSF and G-CSF in the formation of granulocytic colonies in vitro. 96 Mobilization regimens combining GM-CSF with G-CSF have consisted of sequential or concurrent administration of these agents at a range of doses (G-CSF, 5-10 mg/kg; GM-CSF, 5 mg/kg-250 mg/m 2 ), with or without chemotherapeutic agents.…”
Section: Mobilization Agent Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%