2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2016.11.052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced adhesion and proliferation of human umbilical vein endothelial cells on conductive PANI-PCL fiber scaffold by electrical stimulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
41
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
4
41
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Ghasemi-Mobarakeh et al reported that applying direct current to polyaniline/gelatin (15:85) with electrical conductivity of 0.02 × 10 −6 S amended the NSCs proliferation and neurite outgrowth; 24 likewise, Li et al used polyaniline/PCL nanofibers with electrical stimulation to culture human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) and reported promotion in growth for the cultured cells in the presence of conductive polymer. 25 As shown in Figure 2C, the electrical conductivity of nanofiber scaffolds was PAG dose-dependent. In comparison to the results reported by Baniasadi et al, the conductivity of the fabricated nanofiber scaffolds in the present study declined due to the presence of PCL nanofibers although its conductivity is around 1.2×10 −5 S/cm which is still in an appropriate range to be used for neural tissue engineering.…”
Section: Electrical Conductivity Measurementmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Ghasemi-Mobarakeh et al reported that applying direct current to polyaniline/gelatin (15:85) with electrical conductivity of 0.02 × 10 −6 S amended the NSCs proliferation and neurite outgrowth; 24 likewise, Li et al used polyaniline/PCL nanofibers with electrical stimulation to culture human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) and reported promotion in growth for the cultured cells in the presence of conductive polymer. 25 As shown in Figure 2C, the electrical conductivity of nanofiber scaffolds was PAG dose-dependent. In comparison to the results reported by Baniasadi et al, the conductivity of the fabricated nanofiber scaffolds in the present study declined due to the presence of PCL nanofibers although its conductivity is around 1.2×10 −5 S/cm which is still in an appropriate range to be used for neural tissue engineering.…”
Section: Electrical Conductivity Measurementmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…found that biocompatibility of PANI can be increased by repeated deprotonation and reprotonation cycles, indicating that the release of by-products of the polymer synthesis is the main cause of cytotoxicity of PANI rather than PANI itself [32]. This study assessed cell proliferation up to 21 days, which is longer than other studies [26,32,54,78] and may allow the build-up of cytotoxic effects that might not be observed during shorter studies. Therefore, further investigation is required to ascertain the role of dopant or by-product release on biocompatibility and additional purification and washing steps of the samples may be required.…”
Section: Cell Viability and Proliferationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The abundant quinoid imine (-N=) enhances the electron delocalization, ensuring high conductivity of PANI chains. [46][47][48] Besides, the peak appearing at 208 eV in the full spectrum is ascribed to an enriched doping of ClO 4 − in PANI, which results in numerous unsaturated bonds and provides substantial reactive sites for the redox reaction [49]. Accordingly, RGO/PEDOT/PANI exhibits a higher capacitance (535 F g −1 ) compared with RGO/PEDOT (228 F g −1 ).…”
Section: Go/pedot:pss Rgo/pedot Rgo/pedot/pani Go/pedot:pss Rgo/pedotmentioning
confidence: 99%