Enhanced bioremoval of refractory compounds from dyeing wastewater using optimized sequential anaerobic/aerobic process

Abstract

The upflow anaerobic sludge blanket process followed by the biological aerated filter process was employed to improve the removal of color and recalcitrant compounds from real dyeing wastewater. The highest removal efficiency for color was observed in the anaerobic process, at 8-h hydraulic retention time, seeded with the sludge granule. In the subsequent aerobic process packed with the microbe-immobilized polyethylene glycol media, the removal efficiency for chemical oxygen demand increased significantly to 75 %, regardless of the empty bed contact time. The average influent non-biodegradable soluble chemical oxygen demand was 517 mg/L, and the average concentration in effluent from the anaerobic reactor was 363 mg/L, suggesting the removal of some recalcitrant matters together with the degradable ones. The average nonbiodegradable soluble chemical oxygen demand in effluent from the aerobic reactor was 87, 93, and 118 mg/L, with the removal efficiency of 76, 74, and 67 %, at 24-, 12-, and 8-h empty bed contact time, respectively. The combined anaerobic sludge blanket and aerobic cell-entrapped process was effective to remove the refractory compounds from real dyeing wastewater as well as in reducing organic loading to meet the effluent discharge limits. This integrated process is considered an effective and economical treatment technology for dyeing wastewater.

Eco-Friendly Semi-Interpenetrating Polymer Network Hydrogels of Sodium Carboxymethyl Cellulose/Gelatin for Methylene Blue Removal

“…In dye wastewater, it is a major source of pollution. To effectively deal with the pollution induced by dye wastewater, new technologies and methods of wastewater treatment such as electrolytic coagulation, chemical oxidation, electrochemical method, photocatalytic method, air floatation, membrane separation, and biodegradation are constantly put forth [3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. Nonetheless, despite the fact that these treatment methods are more effective, they have strict process conditions, unsatisfactory stability, and high treatment cost.…”