2009
DOI: 10.1007/s11661-009-9854-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced Carbon Diffusion in Austenitic Stainless Steel Carburized at Low Temperature

Abstract: Austenitic stainless steel AISI 316L was carburized by a novel, low-temperature gas-phase process. Using a calibrated scanning Auger microprobe (SAM) analysis of cross-sectional specimens under dynamic sputtering, we determined the fraction-depth profile of carbon. The profile is concave-very different from the shape expected for concentration-independent diffusion-and indicates a carbide-free solid solution with carbon levels up to 15 at. pct and a case depth of %30 lm. A Boltzmann-Matano analysis with a care… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

4
35
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
4
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The slightly convex shape of the concentration profile is due to the strong concentration dependence of the diffusion coefficient of carbon in austenite, D C (X C ). [10] The~20-lm-thick case depth revealed by this analysis is consistent with the optical metallographic and MFM analyses. Finally, the corresponding hardness profile is also shown.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The slightly convex shape of the concentration profile is due to the strong concentration dependence of the diffusion coefficient of carbon in austenite, D C (X C ). [10] The~20-lm-thick case depth revealed by this analysis is consistent with the optical metallographic and MFM analyses. Finally, the corresponding hardness profile is also shown.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The plots further confirm the above conclusions as to which model profiles are most appropriate for the description of the diffusion coefficient. This can also be deduced from the root mean square errors between our analytical results and the numerical results from [39] and [40] (see Table 6). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…One example is the carbon diffusion in an austenitic stainless steel investigated in [39], where the carbon fraction was measured in dependence on the depth below the steel surface to which the carbon extended after carburization (see Fig. 1(a)).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As discussed in the previous paper, 11) carbide precipitation around the layered-steel interfaces is driven by a steep change of C chemical potential across the interface; i.e. C diffusion is sufficiently fast even at the present annealing temperature of 500°C (diffusion coefficient of C in an AISI316 austenitic stainless steel, whose composition is similar to that of the AISI304, is 10 -16 m 2 /s at 453°C 16) ). We find that the thin oxide layer (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%