Enhanced, coordinated conservation efforts required to avoid extinction of critically endangered Eastern Pacific leatherback turtles

Abstract

www.nature.com/scientificreports enhanced, coordinated conservation efforts required to avoid extinction of critically endangered Eastern Pacific leatherback turtles the Laúd opo network † Failure to improve the conservation status of endangered species is often related to inadequate allocation of conservation resources to highest priority issues. Eastern Pacific (EP) leatherbacks are perhaps the most endangered sea turtle population in the world, and continue on a path to regional extinction. To provide coherent, regional conservation targets, we developed a population viability analysis and examined hypothetical scenarios describing effects of conservation activities that either reduced mortality or increased production of hatchlings (or both). Under status quo conditions, EP leatherbacks will be extirpated in <60 yr. To ensure a positive, long-term population trajectory, conservation efforts must increase adult survivorship (i.e., reduce adult mortality) by ≥20%, largely through reduction of fisheries bycatch mortality. Positive trajectories can be accelerated by increased production of hatchlings through enhanced nest protection and treatment. We estimate that these efforts must save approximately 200-260 adult and subadult leatherbacks and produce approximately 7,000-8,000 more hatchlings annually. Critically, reductions in late-stage mortality must begin within 5 years and reach 20% overall within the next 10-15 years to ensure population stabilization and eventual increase. These outcomes require expanded, sustained, coordinated, high-priority efforts among several entities working at multiple scales. Fortunately, such efforts are underway.Species declines driven by human causes have been well-documented across taxonomic groups in recent decades 1 . In some cases, persistent, effective conservation efforts -often coupled with enforced legal protections -have stabilized and even begun to recover populations 2 . Among long-lived marine species such as marine mammals, turtles, birds, and elasmobranchs, there is wide variation in long-term population trends and whether conservation efforts have successfully achieved recovery goals 3-5 . For populations to recover, threats must be reduced to levels that first stabilize, then increase population abundance; however, failure to recover depleted populations often is related to insufficient (i.e., too little for too short a time period) or inefficient allocation of limited resources to conservation actions of highest potential benefit to the target population 6 .Marine turtles exemplify these issues, given their global distributions and varied conservation status among regional population segments (i.e., regional management units, RMUs; Ref. 7 ). Many RMUs within and among the seven extant marine turtle species are depleted relative to historical abundance because of human-caused mortality, namely direct harvest of turtles and their eggs and incidental capture in fisheries 8 . However, some marine turtle populations are showing signs of recovery following conservati...

Satellite Tracking of Head-Started Juvenile Green Turtles (Chelonia mydas) Reveals Release Effects and an Ontogenetic Shift

“…This finding is important both for this species and for this specific population of green sea turtle, a wild nesting population slowly recovering from decades of overhunting within and around the Cayman Islands [ 32 ]. These results are a demonstration of how similar ex situ head-starting studies could be useful for other more critically endangered species, such as the Eastern Pacific leatherback turtle [ 69 , 70 ]. Head-starting and release initiatives, where animals are born or hatched in captivity, raised to an age where their larger body sizes make natural mortality less likely, and released into the wild, have often been deemed unsuccessful ways of increasing sea turtle survivorship [ 71 , 72 ] and potentially disruptive to turtles’ natural navigational abilities, natal imprinting, and nesting site choices [ 59 ].…”

Conservation‐relevant reproductive parameters from long‐term tagging of two globally important sea turtle nesting aggregations in Central Africa

“…Annual survival probability resulting from MSORD analysis was low for both species (0.55–0.68 in D. coriacea and 0.52–0.60 in L. olivacea ) and only in minor part was an artefact of tag loss (annual equivalent: 0.05 in D. coriacea and 0.07 in L. olivacea ); in fact, tag loss for D. coriacea is comparable or lower than estimates from other nesting sites (Pfaller et al, 2019). In D. coriacea , high survival values (≥0.89) appear to be associated with stable or increasing populations, while lower survival values might suggest high rates of mortality (Ábrego et al, 2020; Chevallier et al, 2020). However, knowing survival probability alone is not sufficient to determine the population dynamics, that depends on multiple vital rates.…”

Size scaling of sea turtle reproduction may reconcile fundamental ecology and conservation strategies at the global scale

“…Our meta-analysis showed large variability in the body size for all species of nesting sea turtles with the percentage of protected nesting sites. Protected beaches based on the work of Mazaris et al (2014) might therefore not be a good indicator of nester body size, because they do not account for protection by national laws or illegal takes of adults and eggs (McClenachan et al, 2006) and fisheries bycatch (Network, 2020), which are considered the main drivers of declining population size structure but are rarely documented. For example, although Mexico has a high percentage of protected beaches, illegal (Humber et al, 2014).…”