2013
DOI: 10.1002/pssa.201228752
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced critical current density in MgB2 prepared by reaction of MgB4 and Mg

Abstract: Instead of reacting B and Mg powders, MgB 4 was used as precursor to react with Mg to obtain the polycrystalline samples of nominal composition Mg x B 2 (x ¼ 1.2, 1.5, and 1.7). Upon increasing the sintering temperature to 750 8C, the reaction between MgB 4 and Mg was thermodynamically intensified leading to the formation of larger MgB 2 weight fraction as estimated from X-ray diffraction (XRD) data using the Rietveld method. Despite no further improvement to the weight fraction of this phase by increasing the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The detailed preparation condition of MgB 4 was well described in previous reports [33][34][35][36][37][38]. The impurity phases included in the synthesized MgB 4 powder were removed by the HNO 3 leaching process [36].…”
Section: Enhanced Critical Current Density Of In Situ Processed Mgb 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detailed preparation condition of MgB 4 was well described in previous reports [33][34][35][36][37][38]. The impurity phases included in the synthesized MgB 4 powder were removed by the HNO 3 leaching process [36].…”
Section: Enhanced Critical Current Density Of In Situ Processed Mgb 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 On the other hand, there are many attempts to remove the EPR inactive MgO from MgB 2 material; however, these methods only reached success for a certain amount of reduction of MgO. [23][24][25] In our preparation route, it is also not possible to remove MgO completely by annealing.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For ex situ MgB 2 added with Mg, samples were prepared according to the stoichiometry of MgB 2 ? 0.5 Mg [22]. For this set of samples, we chose 700 °C and 1000 °C as the lower and upper bound temperatures according to the work reported in [14] with a shorter sintering time of 1, 3, and 7 h. The sintering temperature and sintering time were varied in order to find the optimum condition for improving the grain connectivity, hence the J c of the samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%