2003
DOI: 10.1128/jvi.77.13.7330-7340.2003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced Detection of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1-Specific T-Cell Responses to Highly Variable Regions by Using Peptides Based on Autologous Virus Sequences

Abstract: The antigenic diversity of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) represents a significant challenge for vaccine design as well as the comprehensive assessment of HIV-1-specific immune responses in infected persons. In this study we assessed the impact of antigen variability on the characterization of HIV-1-specific T-cell responses by using an HIV-1 database to determine the sequence variability at each position in all expressed HIV-1 proteins and a comprehensive data set of CD8 T-cell responses to a ref… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

8
99
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
8
99
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, mapping with clade B consensus sequence-based reagents may lead to a proportion of T cell responses (particularly in more variable regions of the virus) being missed due to lack of T cell recognition of the consensus sequence peptide (23,24), an issue that we confirmed in analyses performed on a small subset of patients. Secondly, by mapping T cell responses at ϳ2-3 mo FOSx, we may have missed initially immunodominant responses that declined in frequency below the limit of detection by the time mapping was performed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…First, mapping with clade B consensus sequence-based reagents may lead to a proportion of T cell responses (particularly in more variable regions of the virus) being missed due to lack of T cell recognition of the consensus sequence peptide (23,24), an issue that we confirmed in analyses performed on a small subset of patients. Secondly, by mapping T cell responses at ϳ2-3 mo FOSx, we may have missed initially immunodominant responses that declined in frequency below the limit of detection by the time mapping was performed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…It is widely known that the use of peptides based on HIV-1 reference strains in order to screen CTL responses fails to detect the true breadth and magnitude of the response (4). The data presented here indicate that the use of two peptide sets based on the more prevalent subtypes circulating in our region increased the rate of detected responses.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Finally, because relatively conserved regions of the viral genome were chosen for this study, the observed benefits of using toggled peptides when compared with consensus sequence based test sets reflect conservative increases, which may be even more significant when applying this approach to more variable proteins in HV and other variable pathogens (33). However, while designing toggled peptides for highly variable targets is feasible, it will, as illustrated in Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Just as assessing the T cell immune response by IFN-␥ expression alone gives only a limited view of T cell function (32), using only one peptide to probe T cell specificity fails to adequately detect T cell responses. Although autologous peptides are frequently considered the most appropriate test set, peptide test sets reflecting the individuals' autologous viral sequences are prohibitively expensive (33), and given the changing nature of the immune response and viral sequence over time in a given individual, may only allow a limited view of the true extent of the immune response. Thus, toggled peptides may even outperform autologous peptides because they predominantly probe immune responses generated by the incoming virus, but also cover possible escape variants that may have induced de novo responses later in infection (34).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%