2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.147065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced electrocatalytic oxygen evolution activity in geometrically designed SrRuO3 thin films

Abstract: For generation of sustainable, clean and highly efficient energy, the electrocatalytic oxygen evolution reaction represents an attractive platform, thus inviting immense research activities in recent years. However, designing the catalyst with enhanced electrocatalytic activity remains one of the major challenges. Here, we examined the oxygen evolution reaction activities of geometrically designed (with and without step-textured morphology) thin films of an electrocatalytically active correlated metallic SrRuO… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(38 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We next look to leverage this influence of sub-surface layers on OER activity via a thickness-controlled LSMO overlayer on a more active but unstable catalyst, SRO. η on on SRO thin films is close to the thermodynamic potential (η on < ≈0.2 V), [39][40][41] just beyond that of Ru oxidation and significantly lower than that of LSMO (η on = ≈0.4 V). One can expect that an epitaxial heterostructure of LSMO (t u.c.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We next look to leverage this influence of sub-surface layers on OER activity via a thickness-controlled LSMO overlayer on a more active but unstable catalyst, SRO. η on on SRO thin films is close to the thermodynamic potential (η on < ≈0.2 V), [39][40][41] just beyond that of Ru oxidation and significantly lower than that of LSMO (η on = ≈0.4 V). One can expect that an epitaxial heterostructure of LSMO (t u.c.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…While NSTO is inactive for OER, [26] SRO exhibits significantly higher electrocatalytic activity compared to the LSMO (but is unstable) (layer B in Figure 1). [39][40][41] On NSTO, LSMO activity continuously increases with the thickness, up to ≈7 u.c., but further gradually until ≈23 u.c., suggesting the sub-surface d-f) film A (less active)/film B (more active)//substrate geometries. For both cases, the atomic thickness of film A (t A ) is controlled in the ultra-thin limit, for (a,d) thinner than t ec , (b,e) comparable to t ec , and (c,f) thicker than t ec .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hydrogen is regarded as one of the cleanest fuels for the future, and its energy efficient production by water splitting is identified as an important goal of the emergent science and technology. Among the different available routes, electrochemical water splitting process is a technically attractive and potentially viable solution . It involves oxygen evolution reaction (OER) and hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) at the two electrodes, and both these reactions require efficient and robust catalysts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a catalyst in the varied electrochemical processes, single-crystalline transition metal oxide (TMO) thin films have been intensively investigated because of their precise-controllable surface stoichiometry and long-range lattice ordering, which enables us to obtain its link to the consequent catalysis performance. In the oxygen evolution reaction (OER), the surface absorption/desorption and the charge transfer properties between the TMO and oxygen intermediates (including OOH*, OH*, and O*) are determined by the 3d electronic structure and its coupling/interaction strength. Conventionally, the decoration of the 3d electronic structure can be established by A-site chemical doping, oxygen vacancy, strain, and so on . Among them, strain is believed to be a promising approach to modulable catalysis performance as the strong correlation between itinerant charge and crystal field.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%