“…The above-indicated Fe, Bi, Cu, C and O elements of the FeBiCu@rGO sample can be further detected by the EDS tests (Figure S23c), and the SEM/TEM images in Figures S22a and S23a,b demonstrate the rough surface morphology and aggregated particles with the size range from nanosize to microlevel, which are owing to the aggregation of ultrafine nanoparticles; moreover, the particles FeBiCu and rGO have been tightly combined with each other via the ball-milling treatment, which is helpful to improve the performance of the FeBiCu@ rGO electrode. [6f ] The electrochemical reaction processes of the ternary FeBiCu@rGO electrode were evaluated with the help of mono Fe@rGO, Bi@rGO, and Cu@rGO electrodes, as shown in Figure 5b,c, the CV and GCD plots of the FeBiCu@ rGO electrode combine the characteristics of Fe@rGO, Bi@rGO and Cu@rGO, which shows the four pairs of redox couples and charging/discharging plateaus originating from the Fe 2 O 3 /Fe(OH) 2 (A1/C1), [18] Bi 2 O 3 /Bi 2 O 2 /Bi (A3/C3, A2/C2), [1k,19] and Cu(OH) 2 , CuO/Cu 2 O/Cu (A4/C4, A3"/C1"), [20] and the specific reaction progress can be seen in Equations. S19-S24, Supporting Information, moreover, the Fe/Bi redox species behave more actively than the Cu species in the FeBiCu@rGO electrode based on the redox areas and charging/discharging times.…”