2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112443
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced evasion of neutralizing antibody response by Omicron XBB.1.5, CH.1.1, and CA.3.1 variants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
59
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 117 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
5
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We and others have previously reported that the acute B cell response following Omicron BA.1 breakthrough infection is dominated by re-activated memory B cells induced by mRNA vaccination 12 15 . Consistent with these findings, booster immunization with Omicron variant-containing mRNA vaccines induces modestly higher (up to fivefold) peak serum-neutralizing antibody responses compared with booster vaccination with the original mRNA vaccines based on the Wuhan-1 strain 8 , 9 , 11 , 16 , 17 . Although these studies provide evidence for antigenic imprinting in the early B cell response following Omicron breakthrough infection, if and how this response evolves over time remains unclear.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…We and others have previously reported that the acute B cell response following Omicron BA.1 breakthrough infection is dominated by re-activated memory B cells induced by mRNA vaccination 12 15 . Consistent with these findings, booster immunization with Omicron variant-containing mRNA vaccines induces modestly higher (up to fivefold) peak serum-neutralizing antibody responses compared with booster vaccination with the original mRNA vaccines based on the Wuhan-1 strain 8 , 9 , 11 , 16 , 17 . Although these studies provide evidence for antigenic imprinting in the early B cell response following Omicron breakthrough infection, if and how this response evolves over time remains unclear.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…As of 5 September 2023, there have been 41 reported sequences of BA.2.86 from 12 countries in the GISAID database, which is likely underestimated due to limited sampling. Additionally, two other circulating non-XBB Omicron subvariants CH.1.1 (a descendant of BA.2.75 sublineage) and XBC.1.6 (a recombination of Delta and Omicron sublineage BA.2) have also drawn attention due to their great immune evasion capabilities 13,16,17 . As of 29 August 2023, CH.1.1 has expanded from Southeast Asia to over 86 countries, while XBC.1.6 subvariant has steadily increased in prevalence in the Philippines and Australia (https://outbreak.info/situation-reports).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the endosomal entry pathway, Spike utilizes the cysteine protease Cathepsin L to activate and drive S2 fusion across the endosomal membrane 25,32 which does not require prior S1/S2 Spike cleavage by Furin. Whilst replication of Omicron BA.1 supports this hypothesis, post-BA.1, there has been an emergence of subsequent lineages with a continuum of S1/S2 cleavage 44,45 . To date, this has not correlated with an entry phenotype consistent with that observed for pre-Omicron lineages such as Delta.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In the endosomal entry pathway, Spike utilises the cysteine protease Cathepsin L to activated and drive S2 fusion across the endosomal membrane 24,40 and this does not require prior S1/S2 Spike cleavage by Furin. Whilst observations of Omicron BA.1 do support this hypothesis, the emergence of a number of Omicron lineages post BA.1 have observed a continuum of S1/S2 cleavage 42,43 but to date an entry phenotype not consistent with that observed for pre-Omicron lineages such as Delta. For many in vitro studies, we readily support and independently confirm that Omicron lineages may indeed be forced into using the endosomal pathway in setting where TMPRSS2 spike activation is attenuated/switched off.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%