2004
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.183.6.01831728
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced Fertility After Diagnostic Hysterosalpingography May Be a Myth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several early studies with sample size and methodologic limitations and a meta-analysis of their results indicated that this interpretation is possible. [13][14][15][16][17] The likelihood of pregnancy was not greater in women with primary infertility than that in women with secondary infertility; this is in agreement with Spring et al 13 The detection rate for pathologies at HSG was low (20%), which is in agreement with Schankath et al 17 that had 21% rate of HSG pathologies. The study showed 63% of HSG abnormalities to be tubal in origin.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Several early studies with sample size and methodologic limitations and a meta-analysis of their results indicated that this interpretation is possible. [13][14][15][16][17] The likelihood of pregnancy was not greater in women with primary infertility than that in women with secondary infertility; this is in agreement with Spring et al 13 The detection rate for pathologies at HSG was low (20%), which is in agreement with Schankath et al 17 that had 21% rate of HSG pathologies. The study showed 63% of HSG abnormalities to be tubal in origin.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%