Enhanced groundwater recharge rates and altered recharge sensitivity to climate variability through subsurface heterogeneity

Abstract

Our environment is heterogeneous. In hydrological sciences, the heterogeneity of subsurface properties, such as hydraulic conductivities or porosities, exerts an important control on water balance. This notably includes groundwater recharge, which is an important variable for efficient and sustainable groundwater resources management. Current large-scale hydrological models do not adequately consider this subsurface heterogeneity. Here we show that regions with strong subsurface heterogeneity have enhanced present and future recharge rates due to a different sensitivity of recharge to climate variability compared with regions with homogeneous subsurface properties. Our study domain comprises the carbonate rock regions of Europe, Northern Africa, and the Middle East, which cover ∼25% of the total land area. We compare the simulations of two large-scale hydrological models, one of them accounting for subsurface heterogeneity. Carbonate rock regions strongly exhibit "karstification," which is known to produce particularly strong subsurface heterogeneity. Aquifers from these regions contribute up to half of the drinking water supply for some European countries. Our results suggest that water management for these regions cannot rely on most of the presently available projections of groundwater recharge because spatially variable storages and spatial concentration of recharge result in actual recharge rates that are up to four times larger for present conditions and changes up to five times larger for potential future conditions than previously estimated. These differences in recharge rates for strongly heterogeneous regions suggest a need for groundwater management strategies that are adapted to the fast transit of water from the surface to the aquifers.groundwater recharge | subsurface heterogeneity | water resources | climate variability | climate change

The evolution of process-based hydrologic models: historical challenges and the collective quest for physical realism

“…Also, hydrologic similarity concepts can be effectively applied using multiscale methods to resolve the dominant spatial gradients that drive flow; for example, using representative hillslopes to explicitly resolve lateral flow processes (Troch et al, 2003;Berne et al, 2005;Hazenberg et al, 2015;Ajami et al, 2016). In exploring these solutions, we recognize that there is not necessarily a tradeoff between physical realism and computational efficiency -the linkage between spatial complexity and process complexity may be rather weak, as models that are run using a large number of spatial elements may still miss dominant processes (e.g., Hartmann et al, 2017).…”

How can we model subsurface stormflow at the catchment scale if we cannot measure it?

“…Only then is the topographic index derived from a digital elevation model such as the Topographic Wetness Index (Beven & Kirkby, ) a good proxy to estimate the groundwater table across a catchment. Other models, such as PDM (Probability Distributed Model, Moore, ) or VarKarst‐R (Hartmann et al, ; Hartmann, Gleeson, Wada, & Wagener, ), implement subsurface heterogeneity by using Pareto functions.…”

Untangling global change impacts on hydrological processes: Resisting climatization

“…What then are the types of expert knowledge that contribute to the trustworthiness of global change hydrology research? Expert knowledge is regarded as improving the scientific basis of global change hydrology when used for model development and parameter selection (Gharari et al, ), to consider the effects of model structure (Hartmann, Gleeson, Wada, & Wagener, ), and to improve model consistency relative to hydrological process understanding (Hrachowitz et al, ). Thus, although present hydrologic thought does not recommend direct attribution of global change impacts on the basis of expert knowledge alone, it encourages capitalization on expert knowledge in support of a range of hydrologic modelling activities.…”