2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11517-021-02483-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced head-skull shape learning using statistical modeling and topological features

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Craniofacial relationship investigation and facial-skeletal transformations remain a challenging task due to the complexity of geometric structures in the craniomaxillofacial (CMF) region and the significant difference between the geometric topologies of facial and skeletal shapes. It primarily involves 2 tasks: (1) facial prediction representing the estimation of external facial appearance from internal bony structures, which has been applied in VSP for CMF surgery, forensic identification, and anthropological research (Wang et al 2022;Ma et al 2023;Shui et al 2023); (2) skeletal prediction, representing the generation of internal bony structures from the facial shapes, which is of great significance for reference skeletal shape modeling in surgical planning, biomechanical head modeling, facial animation, and rehabilitation (Xiao et al 2021;Nguyen et al 2022). Many automated methods have been developed for facial and skeletal shape reconstruction including the facial soft-tissue thicknesses approach, homologues mesh model approach, and statistical model approach (Navic et al 2023).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Craniofacial relationship investigation and facial-skeletal transformations remain a challenging task due to the complexity of geometric structures in the craniomaxillofacial (CMF) region and the significant difference between the geometric topologies of facial and skeletal shapes. It primarily involves 2 tasks: (1) facial prediction representing the estimation of external facial appearance from internal bony structures, which has been applied in VSP for CMF surgery, forensic identification, and anthropological research (Wang et al 2022;Ma et al 2023;Shui et al 2023); (2) skeletal prediction, representing the generation of internal bony structures from the facial shapes, which is of great significance for reference skeletal shape modeling in surgical planning, biomechanical head modeling, facial animation, and rehabilitation (Xiao et al 2021;Nguyen et al 2022). Many automated methods have been developed for facial and skeletal shape reconstruction including the facial soft-tissue thicknesses approach, homologues mesh model approach, and statistical model approach (Navic et al 2023).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 3D reconstruction of an accurate face model is essential for providing reliable feedback. This is currently achieved by using medical imaging [ 6 ] and different sensors, such as Kinect or 3D scanners [ 7 , 8 ]. Thus, this allows for the analysis of the face with external (i.e., face deformation) and internal (i.e., facial muscle mechanics) feedback for the diagnosis and rehabilitation process of facial palsy and facial transplantation patients [ 9 ].In the past few decades, facial analysis has attracted great attention due to its numerous exploitations in human-computer interaction [ 10 , 11 ], animation for entertainment [ 12 , 13 , 14 ], and healthcare systems [ 15 , 16 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%