Enhanced interpretation of the BRIEF2: multivariate base rates of elevated scores in the standardization samples

Aita, Stephen L.; Moncrief, Grant G.; Carrillo, Alicia; Greene, Jennifer; Trujillo, Sue; Gioia, Gérard A.; Isquith, Peter Κ.; Roth, Robert M.

doi:10.1080/09297049.2021.1998408

Cited by 6 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 36 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In addition, the app home page, provided various behavioural strategies, including motivation, distraction ideas, impulse and craving control, displacement management, mindfulness activities and other tools to address stress management. Parental involvement was not required for the App arms of this intervention 20,21 …”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Parental involvement was not required for the App arms of this intervention. 20,21 Participants in the AppAlone arm were instructed to engage with the app independently each day for the duration of the study and attended three study visits. The study team was available to assist with any technical issues, however, no behaviour-based coaching was provided.…”

Section: Intervention Components (Figure 1 and Table S1)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Participants were asked to complete a series of self-reported survey measures at baseline, week 12 and week 24. Measures included Yale Food Addiction Scale for Children (YFAS-c), 23 The Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale for Children (CES-DC), 24 Executive Function (BRIEF-2), [25][26][27] Binge Eating Disorder Screener-7 (BEDS-7) 20 and Perceived Stress Scale (PSS). Height was measured using a portable wall height indicator ruler, accurate to 0.5 cm (Posh Rulers, Quick Medical, Issaquah, WA).…”

Section: Measurementsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

An addiction‐based digital weight loss intervention: A multi‐centre randomized controlled trial

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Summary Objective This randomized clinical trial tested the effectiveness of an addiction‐based digital weight‐loss intervention, focusing on withdrawal/abstinence from self‐identified problem foods, snacking and excessive amounts at meals, and discomfort displacement, with and without coaching, compared to an in‐person, multi‐disciplinary, care model among adolescents with obesity. We hypothesized that the digital intervention with coaching would yield greater weight loss and lower delivery burden than the standard clinical arm, and greater participant engagement than the digital arm without coaching. Methods Adolescents were randomized to app intervention, with or without coaching, or in‐person multidisciplinary obesity intervention for 6 months. The primary outcome was change in %BMIp95 at weeks 12 and 24. A mixed‐effects linear regression model was used to assess the association between change in %BMIp95 and intervention arm. We were also interested in assessing delivery burden, participant engagement and evaluating the relationships between weight change and demographic characteristics, mood, executive function and eating behaviours. Results All adolescents (n = 161; BMI ≥95th%, age 16 ± 2.5 year; 47% Hispanic, 65% female, 59% publicly insured) lost weight over 24‐weeks (−1.29%, [−1.82, −0.76], p < 0.0001), with no significant weight loss difference between groups (p = 0.3). Girls lost more weight than boys, whereas binge eating behaviour at baseline was associated with increase in %BMIp95 when controlling for other covariates. There was no association between ethnicity, mood, timing of intervention in relation to the pandemic, or executive function and change in %BMIp95. Conclusions Contrary with our hypothesis, our results showed no difference in the change in BMI status between treatment arms. Since efficacy of this digital intervention was not inferior to in‐person, multi‐disciplinary care, this could offer a reasonable weight management option for clinicians, based on youth and family specific characteristics, such as accessibility, resources, and communication styles. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT035008353

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Intervention Components (Figure 1 and Table S1)mentioning

confidence: 99%