Enhanced involvement of general practitioners in cancer rehabilitation: a randomised controlled trial

Abstract

ObjectiveTo test the hypothesis that a multimodal intervention giving the general practitioner (GP) an enhanced role in cancer rehabilitation improves patients' health-related quality of life and psychological distress.DesignCluster randomised controlled trial. All general practices in Denmark were randomised to an intervention group or to a control group. Patients were subsequently allocated to intervention or control (usual procedures) based on the randomisation status of their GP.SettingAll clinical departments at a public regional hospital treating cancer patients and all general practices in Denmark.ParticipantsAdult patients treated for incident cancer at Vejle Hospital, Denmark, between 12 May 2008 and 28 February 2009. A total of 955 patients (486 to the intervention group and 469 to the control group) registered with 323 general practices were included.InterventionThe intervention included an interview about rehabilitation needs with a rehabilitation coordinator at the regional hospital, information from the hospital to the GP about individual needs for rehabilitation and an encouragement of the GP to contact the patient to offer his support with rehabilitation.Main outcome measuresThe primary outcome was health-related quality of life measured 6 months after inclusion using the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). Secondary outcomes included quality of life at 14 months and additional subscales of the EORTC QLQ-C30 at 6 and 14 months and psychological distress at 14 months using the Profile of Mood States Scale.ResultsNo effect of the intervention was observed on primary and/or secondary outcomes after 6 and 14 months.ConclusionA multimodal intervention aiming to give the GP an enhanced role in cancer patients' rehabilitation did not improve quality of life or psychological distress.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, registration ID number NCT01021371.

The Effectiveness of Shared Care in Cancer Survivors—A Systematic Review

“…As a result, this review finally includes seven RCTs reported in eight papers and three descriptive quantitative studies. One RCT was reported in two papers which assessed different types of outcomes [3132]. The results of the quality appraisal of the studies can be found in Tables 5 and 6 (included studies), and Appendix 7 (excluded study), and the examples of the appraisal process with the checklist can be found in Appendix 5, 6, and 7.…”

A randomised controlled trial to improve the role of the general practitioner in cancer rehabilitation: effect on patients’ satisfaction with their general practitioners

“…We have previously reported that the intervention had no statistically significant effect on the patients' quality of life as the primary outcome 22 or on the level of psychological distress, 22 on GPs' proactivity or on the patients' participation in rehabilitation activities 23 as secondary outcomes. In this light, one might question whether we could reasonably expect any effect on patient satisfaction.…”

“…Since we did not have any data to estimate the effect of clustering prior to the study, we attempted to include patients in each group from a minimum of 144 practice units, allowing for maximum clustering. 22 Allowing for maximum clustering concerning HRQOL turned out to be very conservative (95% intracluster correlation coefficient 0.000 to 0.103). 22 It is plausible that the cluster effect is similarly low concerning the outcomes of this study.…”

“…22 Allowing for maximum clustering concerning HRQOL turned out to be very conservative (95% intracluster correlation coefficient 0.000 to 0.103). 22 It is plausible that the cluster effect is similarly low concerning the outcomes of this study.…”

Protein–protein interactions and genetic diseases: The interactome

“…An early study analyzed the interactions of proteins involved in human ataxias to gain understanding of their biological interdependencies and to map their links to known neurodegeneration proteins 82 . To my knowledge this was the first large-scale systematic experimental protein-protein interaction map of a human disease and showed that ataxia-related proteins interacted with each other to a much higher degree than one would expect by random.…”