2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10107-013-0667-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced Karush–Kuhn–Tucker condition and weaker constraint qualifications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
43
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence if x * is D * -quasinormal for problem (33), then (x * , Ψ (x * )) is quasinormal for problem (34). Moreover, gph Ψ is a closed subset in ℜ d+1 by the continuity of Ψ .…”
Section: Corollarymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence if x * is D * -quasinormal for problem (33), then (x * , Ψ (x * )) is quasinormal for problem (34). Moreover, gph Ψ is a closed subset in ℜ d+1 by the continuity of Ψ .…”
Section: Corollarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theorem 3 Let x * be a local minimizer of problem (33). If D * -quasi-normality holds at x * , then there exists ρ 0 > 0 such that for any ρ ≥ ρ 0 , x * is also a local minimizer of the exact penalization problem min x∈Ω f (x) + Ψ (x) + ρ ( g(x) + + h(x) ) .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…stands for the existence of sequences which connect the sign of the multiplier with the sign of the associated constraint in a neighborhood of the stationary point. Enhanced Fritz-John conditions were used previously to generalize some classical results [13,31]. This paper is organized as follows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the enhanced FJ condition is stronger than the classical FJ condition, it results in constraint qualifications such as quasi-normality that are weaker than the NNAMCQ. Very recently, the enhanced KKT conditions for problem (NLP) with locally Lipschitzian data based on the limiting subdifferential and limiting normal cone were derived in [34] and the sensitivity of the value function was established in terms of the set of the enhanced KKT multipliers which may be smaller than the set of the classical KKT multipliers and hence provides sharper results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two technical difficulties involved when the space X is not finite dimensional. First, unlike in the finite dimensional case, the quadratic penalization approach in [34] cannot be employed anymore because the compactness of the closed unit ball is possibly invalid in a Banach space X, which plays a key role in guaranteeing the existence of enhanced sequential approximating solution by using the Weierstrass theorem in [34]. Nevertheless, by virtue of the optimization process, for any > 0, a problem in the form of (MPGC) always possesses an -optimal solution (see [4] for a definition), provided that the optimal value of the problem is finite.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%