“…Seen as the feasible choice to take the place of graphite anode material, transition metal oxides (TMOs) are widely investigated by researchers. , Among various TMOs, α-MoO 3 is considered as a potential replacement of graphite because of its high theoretical specific capacity of 1117 mAh/g and high thermal stability . Meanwhile, the graphite-like-layered structure of α-MoO 3 makes it can undergo reversible Li + insertion/extraction during the cycling process. − Resembling TMOs, transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs) have also attracted great attention due to their high energy density and special structural characteristics. − As a typical representative of TMDs, molybdenum disulfide (MoS 2 ) possesses a complex Li + insertion/extraction mechanism, which makes MoS 2 reveal a more enhanced capacity than its theoretical capacity. ,− Benefitting from those merits, MoO 3 and MoS 2 seem to be promising electrode materials if some intrinsic defects of both can be solved. Pure MoO 3 and MoS 2 have the disadvantages of poor cycling stability and inferior rate capability, which can be attributed to the low electric conductivity and large volume variation during the discharge/charge process. − Besides, MoS 2 nanoflakes also suffer from serious self-stacking and severe agglomeration that bury the Li + conversion active sites. − …”