“…As environmental pollution from traditional packaging materials is becoming a major problem, the use of biodegradable nanocomposites with comparable properties in food packaging could replace petroleum-based plastic packaging materials . Biodegradable polymers, such as polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) and polylactic acid (PLA), have received increasing attention as food packaging materials and in tissue engineering and biomedical fields due to good biocompatibility and enhanced properties. , Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) (PHB) and poly(3-hydroxybutyrate- co -3-hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV) as main members in PHAs family are used to replace petroleum-based traditional packaging plastic due to their biodegradability, nontoxicity, friendly environmental effect, and biocompatibility. , Compared to high-crystallinity PHB with high melting temperature and brittleness, semicrystalline PHBV produced by adding a few (3HV) units into PHB shows larger toughness, lower melting temperature, and crystallinity; thus, PHBV is more suitable for the industrial packaging application. − These advantages make PHBV bioplastics an ideal choice as nanocomposite packaging materials for food products, especially the global bioplastics market with economical values of US $43.8 billion in 2020 at a compound annual growth rate of 28.8%. ,, However, PHBV polymer has some disadvantages such as its brittleness, narrow processing window, poor thermal and mechanical properties, no antibacterial activity, and low resistance to water vapor permeability. ,− These limitations can affect most packaging and biomedical applications. Besides, PHBV has a high price depending on the HV amount; , the used PHBV in this study contained a lower percentage of HV (2.57%) to reduce cost of the resulting nanocomposites.…”