Stimulants like methylphenidate are increasingly used for cognitive enhancement, but precise mechanisms are unknown. Here we show that methylphenidate boosts willingness to expend cognitive effort by altering the benefit-to-cost ratio of cognitive work. Willingness to 15 expend effort was greater for participants with higher striatal dopamine synthesis capacity, while methylphenidate and sulpiride -a selective D2 receptor agent -increased cognitive motivation more for participants with lower synthesis capacity. A sequential sampling model informed by momentary gaze revealed that decisions to expend effort are related to amplification of benefitversus-cost information attended early in the decision process, while the effect of benefits is 20 strengthened with higher synthesis capacity and by methylphenidate. These findings demonstrate that methylphenidate boosts the perceived benefits-versus-costs of cognitive effort by modulating striatal dopamine signaling.
Main Text:Cognitive control is subjectively effortful, causing people to avoid demanding tasks (1) 25 and to discount goals (2, 3), but incentives can offset these costs (2). Striatal dopamine invigorates physical action by mediating the tradeoff between physical costs and benefits (4). In cortico-striatal loops governing action selection, dopamine has opponent effects on D1 and D2expressing medium spiny neurons, which are thought to modulate the relative sensitivity to the benefits versus the costs of actions (5). Given that similar mechanisms are thought to govern 30 cognitive action selection (6-8), we hypothesized that striatal dopamine could promote willingness to exert cognitive effort, boosting motivated cognitive control for attention, planning, and decision-making (9-12).Converging evidence from research on Parkinson's disease (13)(14)(15)(16)(17), showing dopaminedependent changes in cognitive motivation, provides an initial basis for this conjecture. 35 Moreover, catecholamine-enhancing psychostimulants alter cognitive effort-based choice in both rodents (10) and humans (18). This raises the question of whether commonly used "smart drugs" act by enhancing the willingness rather than ability to exert cognitive control. Indeed, the dominant interpretation of stimulant effects is that they improve cognitive processing, via direct effects on cortical areas,