2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.02.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced nitrogen removal of low C/N wastewater in constructed wetlands with co-immobilizing solid carbon source and denitrifying bacteria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It indicates that an excessive amount of nitrogen would be discharged to the natural waters if additional treatment has not been applied after secondary treatment. In the last decades, excessive nitrogen discharge from the wastewater treatment plant has caused severe eutrophication and destructed the aquatic ecosystems (Yu et al, 2019). Different from other pretreatments, TN concentration in the supernatant was nearly not changed (from 40.50 mg/L to 45.00 mg/L) after acidic pretreatment (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…It indicates that an excessive amount of nitrogen would be discharged to the natural waters if additional treatment has not been applied after secondary treatment. In the last decades, excessive nitrogen discharge from the wastewater treatment plant has caused severe eutrophication and destructed the aquatic ecosystems (Yu et al, 2019). Different from other pretreatments, TN concentration in the supernatant was nearly not changed (from 40.50 mg/L to 45.00 mg/L) after acidic pretreatment (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…It indicates that the nitrogen concentration in the e uent of secondary sedimentation was high and an excessive amount of nitrogen would be discharged to the natural waters if addition treatment has not been applied after secondary treatment. In the last decades, excessive nitrogen discharging from the wastewater treatment plant has caused severe eutrophication and destructed the aquatic ecosystems (Yu et al, 2019). Different from other pretreatments, TN concentration in the supernatant was nearly not changed (from 40.5 mg/L to 45 mg/L) after acidic pretreatment (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Comparison of performance between C/N = 4 and C/N = 2 at 1000 Ω The unique advantage and limitation of Cupriavidus sp. S1 are effective nitrogen removal at high C/N ratios (12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28) and the substantial restriction of denitrification at low C/N ratios (≤ 4), respectively. Therefore, the low C/N ratio in the cathode chamber at first was controlled at two values (4 and 2) at the R ext of 1000 Ω. Nitrogen in the synthetic wastewater was in the form of NO − 3 -N at the beginning of each cycle.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the application was restricted because of huge purchasing costs, additional resource consumption and complex operation. Also, the amount of addition was ambiguous, which could cause in‐complete or overdosing of the denitrification, which had a great influence on nitrogen and organic removal . Therefore, it is of great significance for HNADB to seek economical and effective treatment technology for low C/N wastewater.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%