2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2022.128120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced nutrient removal and bioenergy production in microalgal photobioreactor following anaerobic membrane bioreactor for decarbonized wastewater treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…NH 4 concentration in the permeate was measured between 40.8 and 69.6 mg/L while PO 4 was around 5-7.9 mg/L. Although it was not a concern in the study, high nutrient content accompanied by low organic matter and total suspended solids (TSS) in the effluent would enable the application of resource recovery options such as microalgae cultivation in the permeate (Ding et al 2022). In addition, co-digestion increased methane production by up to 190% compared to the mono-digestion of MWW.…”
Section: Historical Developmentmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…NH 4 concentration in the permeate was measured between 40.8 and 69.6 mg/L while PO 4 was around 5-7.9 mg/L. Although it was not a concern in the study, high nutrient content accompanied by low organic matter and total suspended solids (TSS) in the effluent would enable the application of resource recovery options such as microalgae cultivation in the permeate (Ding et al 2022). In addition, co-digestion increased methane production by up to 190% compared to the mono-digestion of MWW.…”
Section: Historical Developmentmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The resulting biomass can be valorized for various applications, from biofuels to high-value compounds, potentially offsetting treatment costs and generating revenue. [35,36] However, integrating microalgae into wastewater treatment is not without challenges. Upfront investments are needed for setting up cultivation systems.…”
Section: Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The net energy demand per tonne of produced microalgae biomass, represented by E (kWh•tVSS -1 ), was determined using (15), requiring to estimate the total thermal energy demand, denoted as Q demand (kWh•tVSS -1 ), by means of ( 16); the balance of the total electrical energy demand, W demand (kWh•tVSS -1 ), defined in (17); and the biomethane production, Q BM (kWh•tVSS -1 ), in Scenarios 2 and 3, calculated using (18). Note that positive values denote net energy consumption, while negative values signify net energy recovery.…”
Section: Energy and Ghg Emissions Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reducing surface area requirements entails minimizing the long hydraulic retention times (HRTs) typically needed for water treatment, i.e., 3-10 days [14][15][16]. One potential solution involves separating microalgae biomass from the treated water, allowing higher wastewater flow into the system to enhance nutrient loads, as they can be limiting in sewage treatment [17,18]. This separation enables decoupling HRT and SRT, which grants microalgae extended growth time within the microalgal photobioreactor (PBR).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%