2022
DOI: 10.1080/14685248.2021.2014058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced outer peaks in turbulent boundary layer using uniform blowing at moderate Reynolds number

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The exhalation volume flow rate was 8 l/min, corresponding to the respiratory minute volume of quietly seated occupants. For further details on the DEHS particle, interested readers are referred to [7], [8] and [9].…”
Section: Functional Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The exhalation volume flow rate was 8 l/min, corresponding to the respiratory minute volume of quietly seated occupants. For further details on the DEHS particle, interested readers are referred to [7], [8] and [9].…”
Section: Functional Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 2D3C stereo PIV measurements used for the present PINNs predictions are from [10,12]. The measurements were taken at the boundary-layer wind-tunnel facility at Laboratoire de Mécanique des Fluides de Lille-Kampé de Fériet [7] in France, within the European High Performance Infrastructures in Turbulence (EuHIT) framework.…”
Section: Pinns Predictions Of the Piv Flow Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wall-shear stress plays an important role in the analysis of TBL data, not only when it comes to scaling the mean profile but also for quantify the role of skin friction in TBL-control experiments [9]. Traditionally, the determination of wall-shear stress through direct measurement was mostly based on direct oil-film interferometry (OFI) [21], surface hot-film interferometry (SHFA) [31] or non-intrusive laser-doppler anemometry (LDA) [13]. Application of another measurement technique only to infer wall-shear data in conjunction with PIV is often not possible depending on the experimental setup.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The flow visualization was done with a continuous-wave laser (model Ray power 450 from manufacturer Dantec Dynamics with a wavelength of 532 nm and power approx. 0.5 W) and Di-Ethyl-Hexyl-Sebacat (DEHS) particles with ∼0.3 μm size [9]. Figure 2 shows the flow visualization images where heated dummies create significant changes in the room flow, up-and down-washing due to thermal convection is indicated by the yellow and blue arrows respectively.…”
Section: Cottbus Aerosol Particlementioning
confidence: 99%