2007
DOI: 10.1002/cjce.5450850415
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced Performance Assessment of Subspace Model‐Based Predictive Controller with Parameters Tuning

Abstract: THE CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING 537This study focuses on performance assessment of model predictive control. An MPC-achievable benchmark for the unconstrained case is proposed based on closed-loop subspace identifi cation. Two performance measures can be constructed to evaluate the potential benefi t to update the new identifi ed model. Potential benefi t by tuning the parameter can be found from trade-off curves. Effect of constraints imposed on process variables can be evaluated by the installed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Third, possible performance degradation of the controller is detected. The main focus of the existing works on performance monitoring of SPC concentrates on the first and second steps [36,52], and the third step is not addressed adequately.…”
Section: Spc Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, possible performance degradation of the controller is detected. The main focus of the existing works on performance monitoring of SPC concentrates on the first and second steps [36,52], and the third step is not addressed adequately.…”
Section: Spc Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lee JH and Yu ZH (1994) studied tuning rules about general state-space representation MPC, and provided tuning principle to obtain nominal stability, then to detune robust performance for infinite horizon MPC. Zhang and Li (2007) focused on performance assessment of MPC, and an MPC-achievable benchmark was proposed on subspace identification. They used trade-off curves to find potential benefit by tuning weighting parameters and by a different combination of P and M in MPC-achievable benchmark, then optimal horizon numbers can be selected.…”
Section: Controller Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the bounds proposed by McIntosh et al , are based on the simulated process delay and rise time. In recent years, advances in subspace identification , and automated testing have allowed practitioners to dramatically reduce the cost of tuning MPC applications . The autocovariance least-squares technology developed by Rawlings’ group , is expected to make Kalman filtering much more accessible by automatically identifying the main tuning parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%