2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2017.09.084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced photocatalytic activities of g-C3N4 with large specific surface area via a facile one-step synthesis process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
45
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As depicted in Fig. 4a, the minor (1 0 0) peak corresponds to the in-plane repeated tri-striazine units, while the main peak (0 0 2) is relevant to the interlayer stacking of the conjugated aromatic segments [47]. Compared with pure g-C 3 N 4 , the (1 0 0) diffraction peak totally disappeared in the hybrids, while the intensity of (0 0 2) peak showed a gradual decrease until it was significantly weakened in Hybrid I.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As depicted in Fig. 4a, the minor (1 0 0) peak corresponds to the in-plane repeated tri-striazine units, while the main peak (0 0 2) is relevant to the interlayer stacking of the conjugated aromatic segments [47]. Compared with pure g-C 3 N 4 , the (1 0 0) diffraction peak totally disappeared in the hybrids, while the intensity of (0 0 2) peak showed a gradual decrease until it was significantly weakened in Hybrid I.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4d), the N 1s peak of g-C 3 N 4 was decomposed into three components at 398.7, 399.3, and 400.9 eV, corresponding to sp 2 -hybridized nitrogen (C@NAC, edge N atoms), tertiary nitrogen (NA(C) 3 , inner and bridge N atoms) and amino functional groups (C@NAH) caused by incomplete condensation, respectively (Fig. 5a) [47]. Similar results were also noticed with Hybrid I, but it was notable that the N 1s peak of Hybrid I moved to a lower binding energy (C@NAC at 398.3 eV, and C@NAH at 400.5 eV) when compared with that of pure g-C 3 N 4 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pt and Pd atoms trapped between g‐C 3 N 4 layers act as bridges that facilitate the charge carrier transfer between the layers (interlayer charge transfer). A drawback of g‐C 3 N 4 is its low specific surface area, usually around 10 m 2 /g . To overcome this inconvenient, the same research group expanded the surface area of the catalyst by coating mesoporous silica (SBA‐15) with nanometre thin Fe‐g‐C 3 N 4 layers .…”
Section: Catalysis With Single Atom Catalysts On Carbon‐based Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The absorption peaks at 1200-1600 cm −1 are assigned to stretching vibration of CN heterocyclic [39]. The peak at 890 cm −1 is related to deformation mode of N-H components [39]. The peak at 802 cm −1 is due to vibration of s-triazine units, indicating complete skeleton g-structure of g-C 3 N 4 for all three samples [25].…”
Section: Characterization Of G-c 3 N 4 Nanosheetsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The broad peaks located at 3250 and 3078 cm −1 are assigned to O-H and N-H bands, related to residual N-H groups and adsorbed H 2 O molecules [38]. The absorption peaks at 1200-1600 cm −1 are assigned to stretching vibration of CN heterocyclic [39]. The peak at 890 cm −1 is related to deformation mode of N-H components [39].…”
Section: Characterization Of G-c 3 N 4 Nanosheetsmentioning
confidence: 99%