2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2015.08.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced propylene/propane separation by thermal annealing of an intrinsically microporous hydroxyl-functionalized polyimide membrane

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
61
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Freshly-cast films showed an increase in bulk density from 1.22 g/cm 3 for the 120 °C-dried film reported in [42] polyimides is known to be beneficial for their selectivity due to the formation of charge transfer complexes (CTCs) [51,52]. …”
Section: Thermal Annealing Of Pim-6fda-ohmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Freshly-cast films showed an increase in bulk density from 1.22 g/cm 3 for the 120 °C-dried film reported in [42] polyimides is known to be beneficial for their selectivity due to the formation of charge transfer complexes (CTCs) [51,52]. …”
Section: Thermal Annealing Of Pim-6fda-ohmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many of these applications, membrane technologies are preferred over conventional separation techniques (e.g., distillation, absorption, and adsorption) due to their superior features such as [14][15][16][17]: (i) stable production with high separation efficiency [18]; (ii) low energy consumption with no phase change requirements [15,19]; (iii) simple operation with convenient modular scale-up [20][21][22]; and (iv) small environmental footprint [18,23]. Nevertheless, implementation of membrane technologies in practical applications has been limited by challenges with the engineering of robust materials able to be effective under a variety of operating conditions and environments [21,24], with only polymer membranes currently available in large-scale applications; yet failing to overcome Robeson's [25,26] trade-off curves between the selectivity and permeability [25][26][27][28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mixedgas permeation properties measured at 4 bar pressure and 35 °C with a 50:50 propylene/propane feed showed a drop in propylene permeability and C 3 H 6 /C 3 H 8 selectivity for both membrane types (open symbols, Figure 3b), most likely due to competitive sorption effects. 10,28,33 Nevertheless, the highest loading PIM-6FDA-OH/ZIF-8 (65 wt%) membrane maintained excellent mixed-gas performance with a propylene permeability of 30 barrer and C 3 H 6 /C 3 H 8 selectivity of ~31.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%