1999
DOI: 10.1016/s1386-6532(99)00008-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced protection against viral infection by co-administration of plasmid DNA coding for viral antigen and cytokines in mice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
19
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
6
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By contrast, vaccination with plasmid DNA encoding the internal nucleocapsid protein (pVR1012-N) showed at best a partial effect after three immunizations (30% survival). These results are reminiscent of data obtained with nucleocapsid proteins of other viruses like influenza A virus and hantavirus where no or weak protective effects were seen despite the induction of humoral and cellular immune responses [2,19,26,40]. At first glance these findings may be unexpected, but they can be explained by two different mechanisms.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…By contrast, vaccination with plasmid DNA encoding the internal nucleocapsid protein (pVR1012-N) showed at best a partial effect after three immunizations (30% survival). These results are reminiscent of data obtained with nucleocapsid proteins of other viruses like influenza A virus and hantavirus where no or weak protective effects were seen despite the induction of humoral and cellular immune responses [2,19,26,40]. At first glance these findings may be unexpected, but they can be explained by two different mechanisms.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…These results may support the hypothesis that in IFNreceptor ±deficient mice APCs cannot be activated by IFN -to produce IL-12. Finally, (4 ) The results propose that IL -12 expressed from plasmid DNA initiates the positive feedback system, thereby directing the immune response to the Th1 development. The early triggering of the cellular immune response appears to be important for the antimetastatic efficiency of IL -12 DNA treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The human GM-CSF pDNA was included in the vaccine to increase the immunogenicity as GM-CSF is known to attract dendritic cells to the site of administration and enhance the maturation of dendritic cell precursors which play an important role in antigen presentation. [19][20][21][22][23][24] While co-administration of GM-CSF pDNA has been demonstrated to enhance the immunogenicity of pDNA vaccines, [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42] the overexpression of GM-CSF in transgenic mice has been demonstrated to result in adverse pathology associated with overaccumulation of macrophages in tissues, accumulation of macrophages in the peritoneal and pleural cavities, retinal damage, muscle wasting, and a fatal tissue damage syndrome. 37 Thus, the inclusion of GM-CSF in the vaccine raised several important theoretical safety concerns which had to be addressed before the vaccine could be taken into a clinical trial with healthy volunteers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%