2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2015.11.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced Recovery After Kidney Transplantation Surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
30
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
30
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our experience has been different to that of Kruszyna et al . in Poland who demonstrated a median hospital stay of 10 days (range 6–46), which is possibly related to their practice of managing patients with delayed graft function in the hospital as opposed to our practice of managing them in the community.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 96%
“…Our experience has been different to that of Kruszyna et al . in Poland who demonstrated a median hospital stay of 10 days (range 6–46), which is possibly related to their practice of managing patients with delayed graft function in the hospital as opposed to our practice of managing them in the community.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 96%
“…Concerns have been reasonably raised for potential increases in morbidity (eg, by aspiration with accelerated feeding), increased readmission (with early discharge), and higher mortality (by failure to rescue due to early discharge). Two KTX studies of 45 and 46 recipients previously demonstrated that standardized post‐operative care can affect reduced LOS without compromising safety . Another protocol focusing on high‐risk patients was successful in significantly reducing LOS and 30‐day readmission rates (from 20% to 10%) in patients with DGF by instituting a multidisciplinary approach to team rounds and discharge planning, outpatient clinic equipped with an infusion center, and daily nurse visits of patients with DGF .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-standardized, outdated practice has the potential to impact negatively on patient outcomes; the development of an ERAS programme is likely to resolve some of the uncontrolled variation in current practice and would be expected to enhance outcomes. The feasibility of an ERAS programme for deceased donor renal transplant recipients has been demonstrated [28], and there is emerging evidence pointing towards improved postoperative outcomes [29] alongside a wealth of existing literature to support the approach in other surgical specialties [30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%