1999
DOI: 10.2307/4089369
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced Reproductive Success of Female Black-Capped Chickadees Mated to High-Ranking Males

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
39
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In flocks consisting of three or more pairs, the male submissive to the alpha male but dominant over the low-ranking male was considered mid ranking. We observed too few interactions to determine the rank of six of the 26 birds; in these cases, we used age as a proxy of rank, as rank is strongly associated with relative age (Smith 1991, Otter et al 1999, Ratcliffe et al 2007). …”
Section: Winter Banding and Dominance Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In flocks consisting of three or more pairs, the male submissive to the alpha male but dominant over the low-ranking male was considered mid ranking. We observed too few interactions to determine the rank of six of the 26 birds; in these cases, we used age as a proxy of rank, as rank is strongly associated with relative age (Smith 1991, Otter et al 1999, Ratcliffe et al 2007). …”
Section: Winter Banding and Dominance Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus we determined a linear dominance matrix for each flock, classifying birds as low, mid, or high ranking, according to their position within the flock. Because a female chickadee's rank is correlated with the rank of her social mate (Smith 1991, Otter et al 1999, we concentrated on determining relative rank of males within flocks. In flocks consisting of three or more pairs, the male submissive to the alpha male but dominant over the low-ranking male was considered mid ranking.…”
Section: Winter Banding and Dominance Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While females have been found to assess relative dominance status of males by 'eavesdropping' on patterns of response (signal conventions) in male-male territorial song contests (Mennill et al, 2002), how this relative quality is conveyed in the apparently 'solo' dawn in April and May is unclear. Otter et al (1997) found dawn chorus start times, durations and song rates could be used discriminate between categories of high-ranking males and their lowest rank ockmates, but efforts to determine if chickadee song structure, per se, can predict this correlate of male quality have been less than conclusive (Chruszcz, 1995;Evans, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Birds in ocks demonstrate linear dominance hierarchies that can be discerned by observing interactions at feeders (Ficken et al, 1990). Highranking males in these ocks enjoy better access to food (Ficken et al, 1990), improved survival (Smith, 1991), and better overall reproductive success (Otter et al, 1999) than their low-ranking ockmates. Although pairing appears assortative by social rank, females commonly seek extra-pair copulations with males that rank higher than their social mates do (Otter et al, 1998;Mennill et al, 2002) and divorce their mates for males of higher rank when the circumstances arise (Otter & Ratcliffe, 1996;Ramsay et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dominant males show improved territory acquisition (Desrochers et al 1988) and territory size (Mennill et al 2004). High social status enhances fitness through greater hatching and fledging success of young (Otter et al 1999) and higher rates of genetic paternity (Otter et al 1998, Mennill et al 2004. Dominant males are also preferred as the new mates of females that divorce Ratcliffe 1996, Ramsay et al 2000).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%