2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246x.2012.05643.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced resolution for long electrode ERT

Abstract: SUMMARY The resolution of the long electrode electrical resistivity tomography method is investigated through the comparison of arrays. The investigations included a synthetic model study and a pilot‐scale field experiment, in which data from the 2‐pole and 4‐pole arrays were used to reconstruct known targets through inverse modelling. The results confirmed that the 2‐pole array maps conductive targets with low lateral resolution and no vertical resolution. The 4‐pole array performs extremely well or extremely… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following the first modeling and resolution studies of Ramirez et al (2003) and Rucker (2012), we carry out systematic synthetic simulations to obtain numerically safe routines and to demonstrate the ability of the method in the context of saltwater intrusion. Discretization parameters (electrode diameter and number of facets) were varied to appraise the numerical error and effort.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the first modeling and resolution studies of Ramirez et al (2003) and Rucker (2012), we carry out systematic synthetic simulations to obtain numerically safe routines and to demonstrate the ability of the method in the context of saltwater intrusion. Discretization parameters (electrode diameter and number of facets) were varied to appraise the numerical error and effort.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is observed from the table that for all the models, the reconstructed resistivity values of the blocks are underestimated compared to the resistivity of the true models, while for the background the reconstructed resistivity values are an overestimation. In essence, the amplitude of resistivity has been dampened and is a known feature inherent in resistivity imaging (RUCKER 2012). For the individual electrode arrays, it is observed that the dipoledipole images give better results than WennerSchlumberger and pole-dipole images.…”
Section: Synthetic Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Several researchers have compared different electrode arrays individually on the basis of their sensitivity analysis, depth of investigations, and responses to resolving vertical or horizontal structures (SASAKI 1992;DAHLIN 2001;BENTLEY and GHARIBI 2004;FIANDACA et al 2005;CAPIZZI et al 2007;BERGE and DRAHOR 2009;MARTORANA et al 2009;NEYAMADPOUR et al 2010;RUCKER 2012). Meanwhile, in related studies, the use of joint inversion techniques have been introduced and used for combining two or more geophysical data into a single image for the cross gradients (GALLARDO and MEJU 2003 and structural approach (HABER and OLDENBURG 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To combat this, a different array could be used where model resolution is more evenly distributed throughout the domain. Many have recognized that particular optimized arrays can produce better subsurface images (e.g., Stummer, Maurer and Green 2004;Loke, Wilkinson and Chambers 2010;Wilkinson et al 2012), which could easily be employed here by transposing the pole-pole array to any desired four-pole array, as shown practically in Rucker (2012). When constrained by the electrical current information, it is anticipated that a new level of accuracy can be achieved in resistivity imaging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oldenburg and Li () presented a method to measure the DOI by quantifying how much each region of the resistivity image changed by analysing the difference in two or more inversion results with different model constraints (Freidel ). In our work (e.g., Rucker ), we have primarily focused on the model resolution to investigate the consequence of typical decisions made for conducting resistivity surveys to resolve a target, including model parameters (inverse model cell size) and acquisition parameters (electrode density and array type).…”
Section: Resitivity Acquisitonmentioning
confidence: 99%