The evolution of the surface during the steps that comprise
the
atomic layer deposition (ALD) of ruthenium films on a nickel substrate
using tris(2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-3,5-heptanedionato)ruthenium(III) (Ru(tmhd)3) and molecular oxygen was characterized using a combination
of X-ray photoelectron (XPS) and reflection–absorption infrared
(RAIRS) spectroscopies. The uptake of the Ru metalorganic precursor
was determined to be activated, involving the average loss of two
out of the three ligands (and the retention of the third, in molecular
form, at the surface–vacuum interface), and self-limited, as
required in ALD. The reaction of the resulting layer from that first
half of the ALD cycle with O2 proved to be more complex:
in addition to the desired removal of the carbon-containing material,
the Ni substrate becomes oxidized, and some Ru is etched away in the
form of the volatile RuO4 gas. By testing different combinations
of exposures and temperatures it was determined that Ru film growth
was possible, but tuning and optimizing the ALD or atomic layer etching
(ALE) process conditions for maximum film growth or removal rate per
cycle proved difficult. Replacing O2 with H2 was shown not to be viable either, as such an agent can reduce the
nickel oxide formed after O2 treatments (in fact, Ru(tmhd)3 can do this as well) but not remove the carbonaceous material
deposited on the surface by the Ru precursor. The use of N2O, on the other hand, showed much promise, being capable of removing
most of the surface carbon without affecting the Ru film or the Ni
substrate.