2022
DOI: 10.1002/pssr.202200379
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced Sensitivity for Tm3+/Er3+‐Based Thermometer Through Dual‐Wavelength Excitation

Abstract: How to design the ratiometric thermometer with high sensitivity is a monumental challenge. If the sensitivity can be superposed like the stack of toy bricks, the temperature‐sensing performances will be significantly improved. To achieve sensitivity superposition, a method of dual‐wavelength (980 and 379 nm) excitation in consideration of the sensitivity of integral form is designed and the sensitivity is expected to be manipulated. Herein, compared with conventional 980 nm single excitation, the increase in E… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the fluorescence intensity ratio (FIR) of these two emission bands shows an obvious dependence on the temperature (Figure d). Generally, owing to the nonthermally coupled level, the FIR can be easily deduced on the basis of the polynomial equation F I R = A + italicBT + C T 2 + D T 3 where A , B , C , and D are constants. This expression fitted well to the experimental data, yielding the following: R = 10.2594 – 3.574 × 10 –2 T + 4.4735 × 10 –5 T 2 – 1.8862 × 10 –8 T 3 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the fluorescence intensity ratio (FIR) of these two emission bands shows an obvious dependence on the temperature (Figure d). Generally, owing to the nonthermally coupled level, the FIR can be easily deduced on the basis of the polynomial equation F I R = A + italicBT + C T 2 + D T 3 where A , B , C , and D are constants. This expression fitted well to the experimental data, yielding the following: R = 10.2594 – 3.574 × 10 –2 T + 4.4735 × 10 –5 T 2 – 1.8862 × 10 –8 T 3 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…通过本文的光学测温材 料与先前报道关于Er 3+ 光学测温材料(表1)的S a 和S r 值 [36][37][38] 进行比较, Li 0.9 K 0. 的测温材料 [25] . 因此对于优化后的Li 0.9 K 0.1 NbO 3 :…”
Section: 光学测温性能unclassified