2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2014.09.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced SOFC cathode performance by infiltrating Ba0.5Sr0.5Co0.8Fe0.2O3−δ nanoparticles for intermediate temperature solid oxide fuel cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, one of the most effective methods of controlling electrode degradation is to modify their surface chemistry using a wet chemical infiltration process, which also leads to an improvement F3115 of the cathodic electrocatalytic activity. [36][37][38] Liu's group studied the effect of LSM infiltrated on LSCF porous electrodes in depth, obtaining improved stability and performances in all cases; 39,40 Zhu et al embedded BSCF cathodes with a dense LSM layer, improving performances and stability, although they limited the investigation to a very short time (18 h). 41 It is worth noting that BSCF has both a high A/B-site cation size mismatch in the ABO 3 perovskite structure and a very low oxygen vacancy formation energy/vacancy migration enthalpy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, one of the most effective methods of controlling electrode degradation is to modify their surface chemistry using a wet chemical infiltration process, which also leads to an improvement F3115 of the cathodic electrocatalytic activity. [36][37][38] Liu's group studied the effect of LSM infiltrated on LSCF porous electrodes in depth, obtaining improved stability and performances in all cases; 39,40 Zhu et al embedded BSCF cathodes with a dense LSM layer, improving performances and stability, although they limited the investigation to a very short time (18 h). 41 It is worth noting that BSCF has both a high A/B-site cation size mismatch in the ABO 3 perovskite structure and a very low oxygen vacancy formation energy/vacancy migration enthalpy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5) when Ag loading increased from 0 wt.% to 5 wt.%. This phenomenon has been briefly outlined by Ding et al [9], in which Ag metal may lead to the formation of Ag agglomerates. Therefore, selection of an appropriate Ag loading is important because high Ag loading may form agglomerates that block the pores, causing gas transport restriction that is detrimental for the TPB length and electrochemical performance.…”
Section: Sample Characterisationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…These noble metals are usually expensive for cell commercialization. Alternatively, silver (Ag) is an inexpensive candidate with high electrocatalytic activity, high oxygen reduction rate, low electrical and contact resistance, good mechanical properties and stable in both oxidising and reduction atmospheres [8,9]. The addition of Ag into cathode components has been studied extensively for intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuel cells, resulting in promising cell performance by a significant reduction in cathode polarisation resistance as compared to Ag-free cathodes [10,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Precursor infiltration, which is a method of penetrating the precursor solution into the porous electrode, is the most common approach for forming nanocatalysts in the field of LT-SOFCs. After the subsequent calcination step of the infiltrates, nanocatalysts in the form of discrete nanoparticles or continuous thin film are formed on the electrode backbone. , Compared to other vacuum-based infiltration techniques, this solution-based process is a highly economical and effective method that can simply achieve the three-dimensional surface coverage of a variety of nanocatalysts on a porous electrode backbone. Typically, high ionic conductors [e.g., Ce 1– x Gd x O 2−δ (CGO) and Y 2 O 3 -stabilized ZrO 2 (YSZ)] , and conventional cathode materials [e.g., La 1– x Sr x MnO 3−δ (LSM) and La 1– x Sr x Co 1– y Fe y O 3−δ (LSCF)] , are chosen as backbone electrodes, while highly active mixed conducting materials [e.g., Sm 1– x Sr x CoO 3−δ (SSC) and Ba 1– x Sr x Co 1– y Fe y O 3−δ (BSCF)] , are used as infiltrating ORR catalysts. However, this common droplet infiltration method employing capillary and gravity force lacks precise control of the fluidity, uniform dispersion, catalyst loading of the precursors over various substrate conditions (composition, microstructure, shape, size, and so on). , These limits make it difficult to achieve process compatibility and scalability over a large area for commercializing LT-SOFCs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21,22 Compared to other vacuum-based infiltration techniques, this solution-based process is a highly economical and effective method that can simply achieve the three-dimensional surface coverage of a variety of nanocatalysts on a porous electrode backbone. Typically, high ionic conductors [e.g., Ce 26,27 are used as infiltrating ORR catalysts. However, this common droplet infiltration method employing capillary and gravity force lacks precise control of the fluidity, uniform dispersion, catalyst loading of the precursors over various substrate conditions (composition, microstructure, shape, size, and so on).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%