2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.nimb.2008.11.056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced susceptibility of CaF2(111) to adsorption due to ion irradiation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are however materials, on which no surface tracks or morphological modifications are expected [21] or detected, like e.g. Si [22]. Here we demonstrate, that on substrates which show no surface tracks in form of protrusions or nano-sized hillocks, graphene foldings can still occur, as can be seen in fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 59%
“…There are however materials, on which no surface tracks or morphological modifications are expected [21] or detected, like e.g. Si [22]. Here we demonstrate, that on substrates which show no surface tracks in form of protrusions or nano-sized hillocks, graphene foldings can still occur, as can be seen in fig.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 59%
“…As reported previously for other materials like SrTiO 3 [19,27], also for CaF 2 the length of the ion track can be controlled by varying the incident angle. As can be seen from figure 3 both, the length of the groove as well as the length of the whole track (for definition see figure 1), follow the relation L d tan / ( ) α = when varying the impact angle from 0.3 3 ⩽ ⩽ α in our experiment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Adsorption is enhanced in the vicinity of defects and tracks. Under UHV conditions the morphology of the surface is stable and does not change even after days [27]. However, in situ AFM measurements of irradiated samples are tedious and require dedicated equipment often not available at beamlines.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Terraces are easily identified, the step edges however appear fuzzy, except in the case of CaF 2 where straight cleavage steps are typical. The mean roughness is below 0.5 nm and usually no contaminations are detected on the oxidic surfaces, whereas CaF 2 is easily contaminated by adsorbants, most likely water [5]. For optical microscopy (see fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%