2020
DOI: 10.1002/aelm.201901391
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced Thermoelectric Performance in N‐Type Mg3.2Sb1.5Bi0.5 by La or Ce Doping into Mg

Abstract: N‐type Mg3.2Sb1.5Bi0.5 materials are prepared by cation‐site doping with lanthanides (La, Ce). Both La‐ and Ce‐doped samples exhibit a higher doping limit and greater efficiency than those of chalcogen (Te, Se, S)‐doped n‐type Mg3.2Sb1.5Bi0.5 samples. High electron carrier concentration ≈9 × 1019 cm−3 is obtained in Mg3.18La0.02Sb1.5Bi0.5 and Mg3.185Ce0.015Sb1.5Bi0.5, which is close to the theoretical doping‐concentration limit and induces contributions from more electron bands. A higher electrical conductivit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent defect calculations [22][23][24][25] predicted that the group-3 elements (Sc and Y) as well as several lanthanides including La, Pr, Ce, and Tm are efficient n-type cation-site dopants for Mg 3 Sb 2 and doping with these elements on the Mg sites is able to achieve higher electron concentration than doping with chalcogens on the anion sites. The subsequent experiments [24,[26][27][28][29][30][31][32] confirmed Sc, Y, La, Pr, and Ce as efficient n-type dopants on the Mg sites for Mg 3+ Sb 2−x Bi x . Despite these significant theoretical and experimental efforts on exploring efficient n-type dopants, the n-type doping behavior of many other lanthanide dopants in Mg 3 Sb 2 remains largely unexplored so far.…”
Section: Doi: 101002/advs202002867mentioning
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Recent defect calculations [22][23][24][25] predicted that the group-3 elements (Sc and Y) as well as several lanthanides including La, Pr, Ce, and Tm are efficient n-type cation-site dopants for Mg 3 Sb 2 and doping with these elements on the Mg sites is able to achieve higher electron concentration than doping with chalcogens on the anion sites. The subsequent experiments [24,[26][27][28][29][30][31][32] confirmed Sc, Y, La, Pr, and Ce as efficient n-type dopants on the Mg sites for Mg 3+ Sb 2−x Bi x . Despite these significant theoretical and experimental efforts on exploring efficient n-type dopants, the n-type doping behavior of many other lanthanide dopants in Mg 3 Sb 2 remains largely unexplored so far.…”
Section: Doi: 101002/advs202002867mentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The appearance of the f states below the CBM as well as their hybridization with the conduction band in Nd-doped samples can be attributed to the relatively small energy separation between the atomic orbital levels of the Nd f states and Mg 3s states. Similarly, the above mechanism may be used to explain the low electron mobilities in previously reported La-, Pr-, and Ce-doped Mg 3 Sb 2−x Bi x samples [24,26,31] because of the small energy separation between the atomic orbital energies of the f states of the dopants (La, Pr, and Ce) and 3s states of Mg (see Table S5 in the Supporting Information).…”
Section: Doi: 101002/advs202002867mentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This configuration not only provides a rough diagram to understand the structure-property relationship of Mg 3 X 2 but also gives instruction about the site preference when alloying with other elements [ 113 ]. The Mg1 sites are favorably occupied when alloying with more electropositive alkaline earth metals and lanthanides, like Ca, Sr, Ba, La, and Yb [ 114 – 118 ], whereas Mg2 sites with more electronegative Zn, Mn, and Cd metals [ 119 , 120 ].…”
Section: Chemical Bonding and Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter might originate from the smaller differences in the electronegativity and ionic radius between Mg and the dopants [ 86 , 89 , 159 , 197 ]. The lanthanide dopants with a larger ionic radius, such as La, Pr, and Ce [ 115 , 118 , 193 ], were also found to be effective in achieving higher electron density than Te doping ( Figure 7(d) ) buthad an adverse effect on the carrier mobility. Moreover, the cation dopants on the Mg sites seem to have one more advantage than the anion dopants.…”
Section: Optimization Of Te Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%