1981
DOI: 10.1007/bf00119372
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancement and suppression of urban heat plumes over Johannesburg

Abstract: Observations of the atmospheric temperature structure over Johannesburg have revealed the existence of both well-developed and suppressed heat plumes. Suppressed plumes appear to be associated with the incidence in a stable atmosphere of positive wind shear and well-developed katabatic flow away from the city. A localised cool region in the atmosphere above the central city is invariably associated with suppressed plume development. A tentative identification of wind shear and katabatic flow as the major influ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The difficulties of adjusting for the lapse rate effects on the temperature measurements at the elevated sites causes problems with their use in determining the urban-rural temperature difference. This is because previously published research by DeMarrais (1961), Goldreich et al (1981), Godowitch et al (1985) and Uno et al (1988) indicates that urban and open country vertical temperature profiles are not only considerably different to each other, but that it was difficult to generalize about average lapse rates over both areas between day and night, and over seasonal time periods. The lapse rate at one location could also be significantly different to another, even within the Melbourne region, as the lapse rate depends on other atmospheric conditions, such as pressure, temperature and humidity, which can be influenced by localized surface conditions.…”
Section: Methods Data and Site Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The difficulties of adjusting for the lapse rate effects on the temperature measurements at the elevated sites causes problems with their use in determining the urban-rural temperature difference. This is because previously published research by DeMarrais (1961), Goldreich et al (1981), Godowitch et al (1985) and Uno et al (1988) indicates that urban and open country vertical temperature profiles are not only considerably different to each other, but that it was difficult to generalize about average lapse rates over both areas between day and night, and over seasonal time periods. The lapse rate at one location could also be significantly different to another, even within the Melbourne region, as the lapse rate depends on other atmospheric conditions, such as pressure, temperature and humidity, which can be influenced by localized surface conditions.…”
Section: Methods Data and Site Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The relative position of a location within the urban heat island and the properties of the land use in the immediate area strongly influence the vertical thermal structure at night. However, many urban areas are located in regions where terrain (Goldreich et al, 1981) or water bodies can complicate or mask the urban effects on the thermal field.…”
Section: Spatial Variation Of the Nocturnal Urban Boundary Layermentioning
confidence: 99%