2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2018.02.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancement of antifouling and antibacterial properties of PVC hollow fiber ultrafiltration membranes using pristine and modified silver nanoparticles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
26
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
3
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1, and the pristine block copolymer UF membrane has a surface porosity of 7.5 ± 1.2%, very close to the value of 6.8 ± 1.4% for the PSF control membrane. The annealing process dramatically increased the surface porosity of the annealed block copolymer membrane to 14.4 ± 3.3%, as well as its membrane porosity to 80.4 ± 2.7%; these values are substantially higher than those of the reported polymeric UF membranes fabricated through the phase inversion method [29][30][31] . As a control, there was no apparent change in the PSF UF membrane upon annealing treatment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…1, and the pristine block copolymer UF membrane has a surface porosity of 7.5 ± 1.2%, very close to the value of 6.8 ± 1.4% for the PSF control membrane. The annealing process dramatically increased the surface porosity of the annealed block copolymer membrane to 14.4 ± 3.3%, as well as its membrane porosity to 80.4 ± 2.7%; these values are substantially higher than those of the reported polymeric UF membranes fabricated through the phase inversion method [29][30][31] . As a control, there was no apparent change in the PSF UF membrane upon annealing treatment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Afterward, PWF of membrane was measured again ( J 2 ). The values of J 0 , J 1 , and J 2 were used to evaluate fouling parameters including total fouling ratio (TFR), reversible fouling ratio (RFR), irreversible fouling ratio (IFR), and flux recovery ratio (FRR): TFR=J0J1J0 RFR=J2J1J0 IFR=J0J2J0 FR=J2J0 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A submerged aerobic membrane bioreactor (MBR) setup in laboratory scale was used in this study following a procedure detailed in our previous works . The operational conditions of the MBR are presented in Table .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After that, the membrane was immersed in DI water for 48 h. Then, the sample was weighed immediately and recorded as the wet weight (m 1 ). The membrane porosity (ε) was calculated using Equation (1) as follows [ 21 ]: where m 1 is the wet membrane weight (g), m 2 is the dry membrane weight (g), ρ water is the water density (0.998 g cm −3 ), and ρ p is the PVDF density (1.74 g cm −3 ). The data of the membrane porosity were presented as a mean with standard deviations calculated from three data of three separated membranes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%