2005
DOI: 10.1002/scj.20173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancement of CAD system for breast cancers by improvement of classifiers

Abstract: SUMMARYIn this paper, we propose a method to improve the accuracy of classifiers by replacing the connection between the output layer and the immediately preceding hidden layer with an optimal linear transformer. This approach is intended to improve the performance of a breast cancer image diagnosis assistance system. The proposed classifier is composed of a three-layer MLP (multilayer perceptron) and a Mahalanobis classifier. The MLP has only one output unit, and produces output for two categories. If it is a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A fuzzy technique in conjunction with three features was used to detect a microcalcification pattern and a neural network to classify it into benign or malignant. Hagihara et al [10] presented a CAD for breast cancers by improvement of classifiers, used 5 features related to the concurrency matrix, 3 features related to the density histogram, and one feature related to the shape of the extracted region. Furuya et al [11] improvement of performance to discriminate malignant tumors from normal tissue on mammograms by feature selection and evaluation of features selection criteria, and used four types features, first-order statistics features, second-order statistic (cooccurrence) features, density features, and shape features.…”
Section: K02mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A fuzzy technique in conjunction with three features was used to detect a microcalcification pattern and a neural network to classify it into benign or malignant. Hagihara et al [10] presented a CAD for breast cancers by improvement of classifiers, used 5 features related to the concurrency matrix, 3 features related to the density histogram, and one feature related to the shape of the extracted region. Furuya et al [11] improvement of performance to discriminate malignant tumors from normal tissue on mammograms by feature selection and evaluation of features selection criteria, and used four types features, first-order statistics features, second-order statistic (cooccurrence) features, density features, and shape features.…”
Section: K02mentioning
confidence: 99%