Summary We have studied the influence of the peripheral vasodilator hydralazine (HDZ) on the vasculature and blood perfusion of two members of a series of subcutaneous murine adenocarcinomata of the colon (MAC tumours), and the influence of HDZ on the efficacy and/or toxicity of TCNU and melphalan. The fluorescent DNA stain Hoechst 33342, showed that HDZ caused a shutdown of tumour vasculature, related in magnitude to both dose and tumour differentiation state; 10 mg kg-' caused an 80% vascular shutdown of well differentiated MAC 26 tumours, but only a 50% shutdown of the poorly differentiated MAC 15A tumours. 2.5 mg kg-' was ineffective. The blood perfusion marker 99mTc-HMPAO showed that the normal perfusion of MAC tumours was consistently markedly less than that of lung, liver or kidneys (4-5% of lung perfusion). HDZ (10 mg kg-') decreased MAC 26 perfusion by 63%, and that of MAC 15A by 20%. Again, 2.5 mg kg-') was ineffective. Use of in vivo to in vitro clonogenic assays showed that HDZ (10 mg kg-') potentiated the efficacy of melphalan ( -Omg kg-' i.p.) by a factor of 2.1, and increased the efficacy of TCNU ( -1O mg kg-' i.v., factor = 1.7) when given 10 or 15 min respectively after dosing. However, the addition of HDZ increased the acute bone marrow toxicity of melphalan, but not that of TCNU. The clinical relevance of these results is discussed.An important factor influencing the delivery and therefore effectiveness of antitumour agents is the relative perfusion of tumour and other tissues with blood. It has been known for more than 40 years (Algire & Legallais, 1951) that perfusion of experimental tumours can be manipulated by the use of vasoactive agents, and a recent paper (Hirst & Wood, 1989) cites more than 25 compounds with the demonstrated ability to alter experimental tumour blood flow, the majority of these causing a decrease.Typical of these is the antihypertensive hydralazine (HDZ), which has been shown to decrease the blood flow through experimental tumours when administered at doses ranging from 0.5-10 mg kg-' either intraperitoneally (i.p.) (Brown 1987;Babbs et al., 1982) or intravenously (i.v.) (Chan et al., 1984;. The results presented for the influence of lower doses of HDZ appear contradictory: Kalmus et al. (1990) showed that 0.25 mg kg-' HDZ slightly increased the blood flow through FSall tumours when administered i.p., whereas Brown (1987), showed that, at this dose, HDZ caused a slight decrease in the blood flow through SCCVII tumours. The influence of HDZ on tumour blood flow is thought to be mainly via two mechanisms: firstly the blood vessels within most experimental tumours cannot be dilated because they are poorly formed, lacking smooth muscle and innervation (Denekamp, 1986;Chaplin, 1987), and maximally dilated already (Chaplin, 1987), and secondly, if the level of the arterial blood pressure drops below that of the intratumoural interstitial pressure (reported to be abnormally high (Wiig et al., 1982)), the tumour vasculature will collapse. Also contributing are secondary effe...