2020
DOI: 10.1080/00222348.2020.1711585
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancement of Electrical and Optical Properties of Sodium Bromide Doped Carboxymethyl Cellulose Biopolymer Electrolyte Films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The increases in the localized levels of forbidden energy band gap lead to an increase in the cases of overlaps between these levels, resulting in a decrease in the energy band gap value. The value of energy gap for CMC polymer is 5.69 eV that was matched with researches [16]. Figures (4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15) to (4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18) show the relation between the extinction coefficient (K), refractive index (n), imaginary (ε i ) and real (ε r ) dielectric constants, respectively, of pure polymer and blend polymer films that calculated from eqs.…”
Section: Optical Propertiessupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The increases in the localized levels of forbidden energy band gap lead to an increase in the cases of overlaps between these levels, resulting in a decrease in the energy band gap value. The value of energy gap for CMC polymer is 5.69 eV that was matched with researches [16]. Figures (4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15) to (4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18) show the relation between the extinction coefficient (K), refractive index (n), imaginary (ε i ) and real (ε r ) dielectric constants, respectively, of pure polymer and blend polymer films that calculated from eqs.…”
Section: Optical Propertiessupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The value of energy gap for CMC polymer is 5.69 eV that was matched with researches [16]. Figures (4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15) to (4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18) show the relation between the extinction coefficient (K), refractive index (n), imaginary (ε i ) and real (ε r ) dielectric constants, respectively, of pure polymer and blend polymer films that calculated from eqs. (3)(4)(5)(6), respectively [39,40].…”
Section: Optical Propertiessupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…49 To understand the factors that influence the crystallinity of the polymer electrolyte, the degree of crystallinity (χ c ) was evaluated, as reported in our earlier work. 50 In the case of the NaAlg− NaClO 4 system, the peak intensity at 2θ = 13°(corresponding to the crystalline characteristic) is observed to decrease significantly with increasing salt concentration due to the interaction of the ClO 4…”
Section: X-ray Diffractionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Salehan et al [ 14 ] reported that the loading of 2 wt.% aluminium oxide (Al 2 O 3 ) into a corn starch (CS):lithium iodide (LiI) provided a conductivity of (6.73 ± 0.78) × 10 –4 S/cm. Shetty et al [ 15 ] documented that the loading of 20 wt.% sodium bromide (NaBr) into carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) provided a conductivity of ~5.15 × 10 –4 S/cm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%