“…Several methodologies have been developed to minimize these problems involving the use of suitable supports, nickel loading, preparation methods and optimized experimental conditions (mainly reaction temperature and hydrogen pressure) [ 11 ], as well as modification of the structure of the supported nickel through development of nickel phosphide [ 44 , 45 , 46 ], nitride [ 47 , 48 ] or carbide catalysts [ 32 , 48 ]. Another very promising prospect for overcoming the above drawbacks and further increasing the efficiency of nickel catalysts is the use of promoters, among which molybdenum oxides are the most effective [ 20 , 21 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 ]. The literature survey indicated that excellent promoting action is observed in molybdenum oxides, mainly for catalysts with a Ni/(Ni+Mo) atomic ratio close to 0.85–0.95 [ 20 , 21 , 49 , 50 , 52 , 55 , 56 , 59 , 62 , 63 ].…”