Enhancement of Identifying Cancer Specialists through the Linkage of Medicare Claims to Additional Sources of Physician Specialty

Abstract

Objective. To examine the number of cancer specialists identified in three national datasets, the effect of combining these datasets, and the use of refinement rules to classify physicians as cancer specialists. Data Sources. 1992-2003 linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare data and a cancer-free comparison population of Medicare beneficiaries, Unique Physician Identification Number (UPIN) Registry, and the American Medical Association (AMA) Masterfile. Study Design. We compared differences in counts of cancer specialists identified in Medicare claims only with the number obtained by combining data sources and after using rules to refine specialty identification. Data Extraction. We analyzed physician specialty variables provided on Medicare claims, along with the specialties obtained by linkage of unencrypted UPINs on Medicare claims to the UPIN Registry, the AMA Masterfile, and all sources combined. Principle Findings. Medicare claims identified the fewest number of cancer specialists (n 5 11,721) compared with 19,753 who were identified when we combined all three datasets. The percentage increase identified by combining datasets varied by subspecialty (187 percent for surgical oncologists to 50 percent for radiation oncologists). Rules created to refine identification most affected the count of radiation oncologists. Conclusions. Researchers should consider taking the additional effort and cost to refine classification by using additional data sources based on their study objectives.

Bundling in Medicare Patients Undergoing Bidirectional Endoscopy: How Often Does It Happen?

“…Second, the data were collected for billing purposes rather than research; and, thus, clinical details, including procedural findings, are lacking. We used UPIN Furthermore, the completeness and validity of self-reported physician-specialty can be suspect (10). However, the completeness of Medicare claims for measuring procedure use is relatively high (11).…”

Variation in the Types of Providers Participating in Breast Cancer Follow-Up Care: A SEER-Medicare Analysis

“…We defined oncologist visits using the Medicare specialty provider code and linked AMA Masterfile. 15,16 In cases where both the AMA Masterfile and Medicare specialty provider code were missing or did not indicate an oncology specialty, we evaluated physicians’ claims to determine whether their clinical practice was consistent with being an oncologist based on specified algorithms of case mix; 15 a breast cancer ICD-9 diagnosis code was required for any oncologist visits identified by these claims-based definitions. 15 Primary care physician (PCP) visits were defined using a similar strategy.…”

Receipt of Appropriate Surgical Care for Medicare Beneficiaries With Cancer

“…Medical oncologists were identified by an associated Medicare specialty code for medical oncology or hematology/oncology or having submitted a claim for chemotherapy. 7-9 Radiation oncologists were defined by a Medicare specialty code for radiation oncology or having submitted a claim for radiation planning or administration.…”