NASA plans to return samples from Mars by 2031. They believe that there is no surface life in Jezero crater but astrobiologists can’t yet rule out surface microhabitats, where life might survive from a more habitable early Mars. NASA agrees it needs to protect Earth from the possibility of native Martian life in the samples.Most of our laws to protect Earth’s biosphere didn’t exist in 1969. The Apollo sample returns had no legal review. With many lapses of containment, they are now seen as an example of how not to protect Earth.NASA's proposal will get careful scrutiny. We find that this may change build requirements. The sample return study by the European Space Foundation from 2012 requires 100% containment of starvation stressed nanobacteria. These pass through 0.1 micron nanopores, far beyond the limits of testing for HEPA or ULPA filters. If this becomes a legal requirement, the technology doesn't yet exist, even as experimental filters in laboratories.NASA is not permitted to risk such a high level of public funds (~$500 million), until they know if their proposed design will be accepted or modified. The requirements could change through to the end of the legal process of 8+ years. Adding 11+ years for the build, we find that NASA won't be ready for unsterilized samples from Mars before 2039 with delays likely.It's possible to sterilize samples at a level sufficient for planetary protection while preserving astrobiological and geological interest. This becomes an unrestricted sample return; a relatively simple process under the Outer Space Treaty.However, there may be interest in the possibility of viable present day life in the samples. If so, we propose NASA return them to a holding satellite in a stable inclined orbit above GEO in Earth's Laplace plane or "ring plane". This particular orbit has many advantages for protection of Earth, the Moon, and other satellites. Sterilized subsamples can be returned to Earth immediately, so there's no delay for geological studies. If the unsterilized samples are of astrobiological interest, scientists can study them from Earth, teleoperating instruments already designed to search for life in situ on Mars, but with almost no latency. We can decide what to do next based on what they discover.This article examines specific worst case scenarios, such as a blue-green algae with everything flipped as in a mirror: DNA spirals the other way; amino acids, carbohydrates, sugars, all are in their mirror forms. A mirror cell should function identically to a normal cell but most ordinary terrestrial life can't make any use of its mirror organics.Synthetic biologists have started a step by step process to flip a terrestrial cell of normal life to mirror life. They warn that such life, if released from the lab, could gradually transform organics in terrestrial ecosystems to indigestible mirror organics giving it a competitive advantage over terrestrial life.To keep Earth safe, synthetic mirror cells will depend on chemicals only available in the laboratory. We might have to leave any Martian mirror life in orbit to achieve a similar level of safety.In the worst case scenarios Mars's biosphere can never mix safely with Earth's. Sometimes quarantine of returning astronauts is also insufficient to protect our biosphere. In other scenarios Martian life is harmless.Future possibilities, and opportunities, open to us depend on whether there is life on Mars and what it's like. Answering this seems a top priority for space colonization enthusiasts and astrobiologists alike.With a combined effort, astronauts could conduct rapid surveys of the most important potential habitats from orbit around Mars, via telepresence. Humans in orbit could control surface robots with minimal latency. This would help resolve these questions as fast as possible.We also suggest that the ESA fetch rover is modified to return a sample of dirt, including the brine layers discovered by Curiosity, to resolve the puzzling Viking lander results. Are these the result of complex chemistry or native life? We also suggest collecting some of the dust to study whether terrestrial microbes could propagate in dust storms and to start a search for dust storm resistant Martian propagules.There is no other terrestrial planet within reach, to study chemical processes on a planet left for billions of years without life. If the apparent circadian rhythms in the Viking experiment are due to complex chemistry, could this be relevant to understanding the chemistry of planets before the first living cells?This mission can easily miss present day life even if it exists in the region explored by Perseverance. However, we can maximize chances of success. Whatever we detect is a useful first step to inform future searches.This article concludes that the complex laws already in place to protect Earth’s biosphere are both understandable and necessary.