2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41551-020-0581-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancement of the blood-circulation time and performance of nanomedicines via the forced clearance of erythrocytes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
92
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
92
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Theterm "MPS" refers to acollection of multiple cells including bone marrow progenitors,b lood monocytes and tissue macrophages,which would be activated by non-endogenous species and responsible for eliminating those foreign nanoparticles.L iver, spleen, and kidneys are some of the largest MPS units in human body and thus explain the substantial liver/spleen/kidney deposition of non-modified PDA-based nanoparticles. [24] To avoid the capture and clearance by MPS,here we modified the nanoplatforms with hydrophilic PEG 1500 ,which could form ahydrated layer at the nanoparticle surface for steric stabilization and reduce MPS capture.T he biodistribution profile also showed that Fe II PDA@IR780-PEG-cRGD accumulation reached maximum at around 8hafter administration (Figure 6a;Supporting Information, Figure S18a-c). Consequently,the nanoplatform-mediated photothermal efficacy in vivo was determined by irritating the tumor region with NIR laser (808 nm, 5min) at the 8hpost i.v.i njection, which was recorded using an IR thermographic camera.…”
Section: Angewandte Chemiementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theterm "MPS" refers to acollection of multiple cells including bone marrow progenitors,b lood monocytes and tissue macrophages,which would be activated by non-endogenous species and responsible for eliminating those foreign nanoparticles.L iver, spleen, and kidneys are some of the largest MPS units in human body and thus explain the substantial liver/spleen/kidney deposition of non-modified PDA-based nanoparticles. [24] To avoid the capture and clearance by MPS,here we modified the nanoplatforms with hydrophilic PEG 1500 ,which could form ahydrated layer at the nanoparticle surface for steric stabilization and reduce MPS capture.T he biodistribution profile also showed that Fe II PDA@IR780-PEG-cRGD accumulation reached maximum at around 8hafter administration (Figure 6a;Supporting Information, Figure S18a-c). Consequently,the nanoplatform-mediated photothermal efficacy in vivo was determined by irritating the tumor region with NIR laser (808 nm, 5min) at the 8hpost i.v.i njection, which was recorded using an IR thermographic camera.…”
Section: Angewandte Chemiementioning
confidence: 99%
“…with cells. [36][37][38][39] Data presented in Figure 8 were obtained using Amnis ImageStream X Mark II imaging flow cytometer. ImageStream, unlike conventional cytometers, employs in its optical systems a time-delay integration-CCD camera, 40 which takes photos of objects in the flow instead of detection of scattered light.…”
Section: Impact Of Rc Mps On Tumor Cells In Culturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) have been extensively used for various in vitro applications, and their unique abilities to respond to magnetic fields make them especially attractive for in vivo theranostics [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 ]. In vivo magnetofection, i.e., the delivery of genetic material with magnetic particles controlled by an external magnetic field, is a promising approach to significantly boost the efficiency of gene therapy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%