2005
DOI: 10.1109/tuffc.2005.1509784
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancements to GPS operations and clock evaluations using a "total" Hadamard deviation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several techniques have been developed for the analysis of the noise altering the output signal of sensors, such as the AV, the HV or the TV [16,17,18,19]. The AV was invented in 1966 by David Allan when he criticized the use of the sample variance estimator in the context of non iid time series.…”
Section: Allan Hadamard and Total Variance Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several techniques have been developed for the analysis of the noise altering the output signal of sensors, such as the AV, the HV or the TV [16,17,18,19]. The AV was invented in 1966 by David Allan when he criticized the use of the sample variance estimator in the context of non iid time series.…”
Section: Allan Hadamard and Total Variance Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, we have just shown that such observable statistics will underestimate 2 r σ by removing portions of L p (f) below f T for x poly,M (t) fitting. For Δ-variance statistics of random error, one can show that such underestimation will peak as τ approaches T. This can explain the well-known tendency of non-total [23,3] statistics of Δ-variances with x poly,M (t) removed to generate downwardly biased results for neg-p noise when τ approaches T. For total statistics [23,3], which double the data to remove such downward biases, it is conjectured that the interaction between the doubling and fitting process causes the appearance bias removal without truly increasing the statistical confidence of the estimate. This, however, needs further investigation.…”
Section: Spectral Representation Of Accuracy and Precisionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…These constants are summarized for each of the five integer-slope noise types in Table I. A method for determining other noise types is to estimate Avar's own bias, or B 1 , function relative to the standard variance [19], [20]. Unfortunately, Avar bias cannot be defined beyond T 2 , or half the data run, since Avar is undefined, which leads us to a difficulty in using this method for τ > T 2 .…”
Section: Methods Of Removing Bias Relative To Avarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. The upper plot shows Thêo1 and Adev operating on WHPM noise type and the lower plot shows Thêo1 with bias removed relative to Adev using (2) and Allan dead-time bias, or B 1 , function [19], [20].…”
Section: Hybrid Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%