2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2015.02.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancing ACE-inhibition of food protein hydrolysates by selective adsorption using porous carbon materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The column bed was replaced after the cycling tests to start with a fresh stationary phase. An a-lactalbumin hydrolysate (AAT) solution containing 0.05 mM Ile-Trp was used as the mobile phase, which is comparable to previous batch experiments [26]. According to the Ile-Trp isotherm, the carbon is not completely saturated at this concentration.…”
Section: Ace-inhibitor Enrichment From Protein Hydrolysatesmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The column bed was replaced after the cycling tests to start with a fresh stationary phase. An a-lactalbumin hydrolysate (AAT) solution containing 0.05 mM Ile-Trp was used as the mobile phase, which is comparable to previous batch experiments [26]. According to the Ile-Trp isotherm, the carbon is not completely saturated at this concentration.…”
Section: Ace-inhibitor Enrichment From Protein Hydrolysatesmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…S8). As reported before, a polarity and size selective adsorption is essential for a successful Ile-Trp purification [26].…”
Section: Ace-inhibitor Enrichment From Protein Hydrolysatesmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These micropores are usually introduced by physical or chemical activation, often leading to broad pore-size distributions and non-uniform pore structures [ 11 ]. However, for size-selective applications [ 12 ], non-uniform broad pore-size distributions lead to lower performance metrics [ 13 14 ]; they are also detrimental to derive clear statements about structure–performance relationships for fundamental research, such as the influence of the pore size and the pore structure on (electro)sorption in energy storage devices [ 15 17 ]. Moreover, purely microporous carbons suffer from diffusion limitations resulting in low electrochemical performances at high charge/discharge rates [ 4 , 18 19 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%