Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications 2010
DOI: 10.1145/1969773.1969777
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancing assessment of in-vehicle technology attention demands with cardiac measures

Abstract: In this paper, the differences between driving performance and cardiac measures in attention assessment research are discussed, particularly with regard to evaluating in-vehicle technology design. A number of ways to enhance a set of measures for the purposes of attention assessment are discussed. Finally, the benefits of including cardiac measures as part of a set of IVT attention assessment tools are discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, the impact of cognitive workload on standard deviation of lane position could not be used to correctly rank order task demand. These results support the arguments by Lenneman and Backs (2010) and Mehler et al (2009) that selected physiological measures are more useful for detecting relative changes in mental workload at levels below which clear decrements in driving performance begin to be observed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similarly, the impact of cognitive workload on standard deviation of lane position could not be used to correctly rank order task demand. These results support the arguments by Lenneman and Backs (2010) and Mehler et al (2009) that selected physiological measures are more useful for detecting relative changes in mental workload at levels below which clear decrements in driving performance begin to be observed.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Physiological measures have been proposed as useful metrics for assessing workload in the user interface design assessment and optimization process (Lenneman & Backs, 2010;Mehler, Reimer, Coughlin & Dusek, 2009). While physiological indices have been used to measure workload for some time, particularly in the aviation literature (Wilson, 2002), until recently data on the sensitivity of such measures in the driving environment has been either limited or contradictory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Those HRV measures that did show a statistically significant difference, had lower effect sizes and observed power than basic heart rate and SCL. These are relevent considerations since the capacity to detect subtle changes in workload is essential if physiological measures are to prove useful in assessing in-vehicle HMI and other demands (Lenneman & Backs, 2010;Mehler et al 2009). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Real-time detection of an operator's workload might be used to provide feedback that attempts to help the driver self-manage the demands of operating the vehicle and associated secondary demands, thereby optimising workload and enhancing automotive safety (Coughlin et al 2011). In addition, sensitive and continuous measures of workload may be useful in the design and assessment of user interfaces (Mehler et al 2009, Lenneman andBacks 2010).…”
Section: Workload and Physiological Reactivitymentioning
confidence: 99%