Enhancing democracy via bureaucracy: Senior managers' social identities and motivation for policy change

Abstract

This article challenges the depiction of bureaucracy as a hurdle to democratic responsiveness. It proposes that senior civil servants' (SCSs) dual position as professionals and citizens may enhance government permeability to salient public agendas. Building on social identity theory, we argue that salient public agendas may arouse SCSs' social identification with in‐groups and thereby elicit their motivation for policy change within their task domain. Employing a mixed‐methods design, we analyze SCSs' social identification with the participants of the large‐scale social protests that took place in Israel during the summer of 2011, and their motivation for policy change in response to the protest agenda. We find that SCSs' social identification with the protesters enhanced their motivation for policy change. In addition, SCSs' perception of a conflict between responsiveness to the protest agenda and their organizational or professional identities shaped their preferences for policy solutions more than their motivation for policy change.

Theoretical Frontiers in Representative Bureaucracy: New Directions for Research

“…Bureaucrats have multiple identities, and the intersection of each of them (not the least of which is the identity as a bureaucrat) are potentially relevant for the study of representative bureaucracy. This section, however, will focus only on the identities of race and gender to illustrate some difficulties in studying intersectionality, but the logic should apply to most if not all cases with other identities (Gilad andAlon-Barkat 2017, 2018). The question becomes when does a bureaucrat respond in terms of 16 Sensitivity analysis implies multiple tests with the same data and thus violates the basic assumptions of probability as applied to inferential statistics.…”

Building organizational reputation in the European regulatory state: An analysis of EU agencies' communications

“…More specifically, different degrees of reputational threats are expected to lead to diverse response strategies: EU agencies performing in contexts containing higher reputational threats have to (re)establish confidence; demonstrate that they care about those affected by regulations; and spend significant time and effort on (re)gaining trust by emphasizing their organizational transparency, openness, and inclusiveness. This is because agencies strive to balance between pursuing good organizational reputations and receptiveness to relevant public demands (Gilad, ; Gilad & Alon‐Barkat, ; Maor & Sulitzeanu‐Kenan, ). Public organizations aim at survival and the legitimation of their roles and activities, which, in turn, make them more sympathetic to prevailing public concerns (Carpenter, ).…”

Social identities in the policy process

“…One of the most prominent and acknowledged psychological theories are the social identity theory (SIT) (Tajfel 1982a) and the related Self-Categorization Theory (SCT) (Turner et al 1987) that are subsumed under the label of the social identity approach (Haslam 2014). Up to now, researchers of policy studies only marginally refer to the SIT (Boydstun and Glazier 2013;Miles 2016;Gilad and Alon-Barkat 2017), when in fact the social identity approach provides the possibility to explain preferences and behavior of policy actors, to enhance existing theories with regard to the model of the individual and to present a tool for political advisors (Winterich et al 2012).…”