2004
DOI: 10.1002/cbm.586
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhancing fraud prevention and detection by profiling fraud offenders

Abstract: The implications of the findings for fraud detection and prevention are discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is noteworthy that the vast majority of frauds in our interview set were uncovered through the action of a whistle‐blower. This finding, which is consistent with a number of prior survey‐based studies (ACFE ; KPMG ; Ernst & Young ; Kapardis and Kramiba‐Kapardis ), highlights the importance of social connections for fraud detection. This may be particularly related to the notion of plea bargaining in the United States, whereby individuals seek clemency in sentencing through cooperation with authorities.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…It is noteworthy that the vast majority of frauds in our interview set were uncovered through the action of a whistle‐blower. This finding, which is consistent with a number of prior survey‐based studies (ACFE ; KPMG ; Ernst & Young ; Kapardis and Kramiba‐Kapardis ), highlights the importance of social connections for fraud detection. This may be particularly related to the notion of plea bargaining in the United States, whereby individuals seek clemency in sentencing through cooperation with authorities.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…For example, Gill et al (1994) found 58 respondents in a survey of 638 people who completed a survey while travelling on a continental ferry admitted some form of insurance fraud and Dodd (1998) produced the only study which has sought to profile insurance fraudsters, but it is dated and based on only 209 claims (only 60 per cent of which were household). Indeed for fraud more generally there has only been limited interest in profiling fraudsters, which has tended to focus upon occupational fraudsters (Kapardis and Krambia-Kapardis, 2004;Bussmann and Werle, 2006; Association of Certified Fraud Examiners (ACFE), 2012; Warfield, 2012). This article will seek to start to fill that gap in research by offering findings from an analysis of over 30 000 dishonest household insurance claims that begins to offer insights on the profile of a household insurance fraudster.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Hence, this makes it an ambiguous term to define. On this note, there exists no single legal definition of fraud which covers all possibilities (Kapardis & Krambia-Kapardis, 2004). Fraud is better understood when viewed from the criminological construct with potential legal repercussion that varies depending on where and how it is committed (Turvey, 2013).…”
Section: What Is Fraud?mentioning
confidence: 99%